R. L. Harding v. P. v. Cavanaugh, 208 F.2d 632 (2d Cir. 1953). · Go Syfert
Search
R. L. Harding v. P. v. Cavanaugh, 208 F.2d 632 (2d Cir. 1953). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
63 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 24 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Schiffer (paed, 1993-09-08)
Treatment trajectory · 1953 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1953 1989 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Schiffer
E.D. Pa. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Accardo, 113 F.Supp. 783, 785 (D.N.J.), aff'd, 208 F.2d 632 (3d Cir.1953), cert. denied, 347 U.S. 952 , 74 S.Ct. 677 , 98 L.Ed. 1098 (1954). 46 .Indeed, the grave nature of the crime alleged would be sufficient to raise serious questions in an examiner’s mind as to Schiffer’s good moral character.
cited Cited "see" United States v. Osidach
E.D. Pa. · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
See U. S. v. Accardo, 113 F.Supp. 783, 785-786 (D.N.J.1953), aff’d per curiam, 208 F.2d 632 (3d Cir.) (failure to disclose other arrests when asked constitutes concealment).
discussed Cited "see" Nash v. Reedel
E.D. Pa. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Accardo, 113 F.Supp. 783 (D.N.J.), affirmed, 208 F.2d 632 (3d Cir. 1953), cert. denied, 347 U.S. 952 , 74 S.Ct. 677 , 98 L.Ed. 1098 (1954). 2 Assuming then as a general matter that collateral estoppel may be invoked as a defense to a § 1983 action where the plaintiff has been found guilty of criminal charges involving the same set of facts, the question is whether Nash is estopped on the facts of this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
R. L. Harding
v.
P. v. Cavanaugh
22705.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Dec 29, 1953.
208 F.2d 632
Published

208 F.2d 632

R. L. HARDING, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
P. V. CAVANAUGH et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 55.

Docket 22705.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued December 10, 1953.

Decided December 29, 1953.

Appeal from the United States District Court of Connecticut; J. Joseph Smith, Judge.

R. L. Harding, pro se.

Ernest H. Halstedt, Asst. Atty. Gen., for defendants-appellees.

Before CHASE, Chief Judge, and L. HAND and MEDINA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

Judgment affirmed.