Exner Sand & Gravel Corp. v. Swenson, 212 F.2d 205 (2d Cir. 1954). · Go Syfert
Search
Exner Sand & Gravel Corp. v. Swenson, 212 F.2d 205 (2d Cir. 1954). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
23 citation events across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: New Life Tabernacle v. Commissioner (tax, 1982-06-29)
Treatment trajectory · 1954 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1954 1990 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" New Life Tabernacle v. Commissioner
Tax Ct. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See Gemological Institute of America v. Commissioner , 17 T.C. 1604 (1952) , affd. 212 F.2d 205 (CA9 1954) .
cited Cited "see" Exner Sand & Gravel Corp. v. Petterson Lighterage & Towing Corp.
E.D.N.Y · 1957 · signal: see · confidence high
See D.C., 110 F.Supp. 531 , affirmed, 2 Cir., 212 F.2d 205 .
cited Cited "see" Gemological Institute of America, Inc. v. Riddell
S.D. Cal. · 1957 · signal: see · confidence high
See, Gemological Institute of America v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 9 Cir., 1954, 212 F.2d 205 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Exner Sand & Gravel Corporation, Owner of the Scow Florence E., Libellant-Appellant
v.
John Walter Swenson and Carl Swenson, Doing Business Under the Name and Style of John Swenson Drydocks, the Florence E
22739.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Apr 27, 1954.
212 F.2d 205
Published

212 F.2d 205

EXNER SAND & GRAVEL CORPORATION, owner of the Scow Florence
E., Libellant-Appellant,
v.
John Walter SWENSON and Carl Swenson, doing business under
the name and style of John Swenson Drydocks,
Respondent-Appellee.
THE FLORENCE E.

No. 211, Docket 22739.

United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit.

Argued April 6 and 7, 1954.
Decided April 27, 1954.

Appeal from a final decree of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York; Clarence G. Galston, District Judge.

Purdy, Lamb & Catoggio, New York City (Edmund F. Lamb, New York City, of counsel), for libellant-appellant.

Mahar & Mason, New York City (Frank C. Mason, New York City, of counsel), for respondents-appellees.

Before CHASE, Chief Judge, and SWAN and FRANK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

Affirmed on the opinion below. D.C., 110 F.Supp. 531.