Am. Dredging Co. v. Calmar S.S. Corp., Cross-Libellant, 218 F.2d 823 (3rd Cir. 1955). · Go Syfert
Search
Am. Dredging Co. v. Calmar S.S. Corp., Cross-Libellant, 218 F.2d 823 (3rd Cir. 1955). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
20 citation events across 12 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Petersen v. Head Construction Company
Treatment trajectory · 1957 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1957 1991 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Petersen v. Head Construction Company
unknown court · 1973 · signal: see · confidence high
See American Dredging Co. v. Calmar S. S. Corp., 121 F.Supp. 255 (E.D.Pa.1954), aff’d per curiam, 218 F.2d 823 (3rd Cir. 1955); Chevron Oil Company v. M/V New Yorker, 297 F.Supp. 412 (E.D.La.1969).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
AMERICAN DREDGING COMPANY, Appellant,
v.
CALMAR STEAMSHIP CORPORATION, Cross-Libellant
11445_1.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Jan 31, 1955.
218 F.2d 823
Samuel B. Fortenbaugh, Jr., Philadelphia (Clark, Ladner, Fortenbaugh, & Young, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellant., Leslie C. Krusen, Philadelphia, Pa., (Krusen, Evans & Shaw, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.
McLaughlin, Kalodner, Hastie.
Cited by 9 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM.

In this maritime collision case, the district court in a carefully considered decision found the appellant solely to blame. Our own examination of the record satisfies us that this finding is supported by substantial evidence. The decree of the district court, 121 F.Supp. 255, will be affirmed. McAllister v. United States, 348 U.S. 19, 75 S.Ct. 6.