Jack H. Halfen v. United States, 220 F.2d 440 (5th Cir. 1955). · Go Syfert
Search
Jack H. Halfen v. United States, 220 F.2d 440 (5th Cir. 1955). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
17 citation events across 10 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Webster Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics (ca2, 1972-03-08)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Webster Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics (2×)
2d Cir. · 1972 · signal: see · confidence high
See Swanson v. Willis, 114 F.Supp. 434 (D.Alaska 1953), aff’d, 220 F.2d 440 (9th Cir. 1955) (U.S. Marshal accused of false arrest and battery); Hartline v. Clary, 141 F.Supp. 151 (E.D.S.C.1956) (Internal Revenue Agents accused of false arrest and assault); Bershad v. Wood, 290 F.2d 714 (9th Cir. 1961) (Internal Revenue Agents accused of wrongfully levying on plaintiff’s bank account); Scherer v. Brennan, 379 F.2d 609 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 1021 , 88 S.Ct. 592 , 19 L.Ed.2d 666 (1967) (Treasury Agents, assigned to protect the President, accused of trespass and unlawful interferen…
cited Cited "see, e.g." Davidson v. Kane
E.D. Va. · 1972 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also, Swanson v. Willis, 114 F.Supp. 434 (D.Alaska, 1953), aff’d. mem., 220 F.2d 440 (9th Cir. 1955).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Jack H. Halfen
v.
United States
15180_1.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
May 12, 1955.
220 F.2d 440
Published

220 F.2d 440

Jack H. HALFEN, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 15180.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

March 30, 1955.

Rehearing Denied May 12, 1955.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas; Ben H. Rice, Jr., Judge.

Herbert Oliver, San Antonio, Tex., Polk Shelton, Austin, Tex., for appellant.

Bradford F. Miller, Asst. U. S. Atty., San Antonio, Tex., Charles F. Herring, U. S. Atty., Austin, Tex., for appellee.

Before HOLMES and RIVES, Circuit Judges, and THOMAS, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

1

The judgment appealed from is affirmed upon the authority of Hanratty v. United States, 5 Cir., 218 F.2d 358.

2

Affirmed.