Comm'r of Internal Revenue v. Mary Miller. Comm'r of Internal Revenue v. Joe Cristo. Comm'r of Internal Revenue v. Clara Cortese, 226 F.2d 618 (6th Cir. 1955). · Go Syfert
Search
Comm'r of Internal Revenue v. Mary Miller. Comm'r of Internal Revenue v. Joe Cristo. Comm'r of Internal Revenue v. Clara Cortese, 226 F.2d 618 (6th Cir. 1955). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
57 citation events across 12 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Richards v. Commissioner
Treatment trajectory · 1955 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1955 1990 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Richards v. Commissioner (2×)
unknown court · 1971 · signal: see · confidence high
See, in this respect, Mary Miller , 22 T.C. 293 (1954) , affirmed per curiam 226 F. 2d 618 (C.A. 6, 1955); Lester B.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
v.
Mary Miller. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Joe Cristo. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Clara Cortese
19-1029.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
Oct 18, 1955.
226 F.2d 618
Published

226 F.2d 618

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
v.
Mary MILLER.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
v.
Joe CRISTO.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
v.
Clara CORTESE.

Nos. 12401-12403.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

October 18, 1955.

H. Brian Holland, Daniel A. Taylor, Ellis N. Slack, Herbert Zarky, and Grant W. Wiprud, Washington, D. C., for petitioner.

Daniel W. Loeser, Cleveland, Ohio, for respondents.

Before SIMONS, Chief Judge, and ALLEN and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

In these three cases consolidated for hearing, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue challenges the correctness of the decision of United States Tax Judge Fisher, reviewed and sustained by the Tax Court of the United States, that cash distributions to employees in total liquidation of a certain employees' retirement trust fund, set up by their former employer, paid to them on account of their "separation from the service" within the meaning of section 165 (b) of the Internal Revenue Act of 1939, 26 U.S.C.A. § 165(b), qualified for long-term capital gain treatment under that sub-section;

2

And this court of appeals having duly considered the findings of fact and opinion of the Tax Court, 22 T.C. 293, the brief and appendices filed by both the petitioner and the respondents, and the oral arguments of the attorneys for the contending parties, has reached the conclusion that, upon the basis of the Tax Court's findings and opinion, its decisions should be and are hereby ordered to be affirmed.