Shinaberry v. United States, 242 F.2d 758 (6th Cir. 1957). · Go Syfert
Search
Shinaberry v. United States, 242 F.2d 758 (6th Cir. 1957). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
40 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 23 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Albert Ginsberg v. United States (ca4, 1983-05-12)
Treatment trajectory · 1957 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1957 1991 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Albert Ginsberg v. United States
4th Cir. · 1983 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Shinaberry v. United States, 142 F.Supp. 413, 414 (W.D.Mich.1956) (“Any doubts as to consent or jurisdic *93 tion of the court should be resolved in favor of the United States.”), aff’d, 242 F.2d 758 (6th Cir.1957), cert. denied, 353 U.S. 976 , 77 S.Ct. 1060 , 1 L.Ed.2d 1137 (1957).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Hawaii v. Standard Oil Co. of Cal. (2×)
SCOTUS · 1972 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., Miley v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Co., 148 F. Supp. 299, 303 (Mass.), aff'd, 242 F. 2d 758 (CA1), cert. denied, 355 U. S. 828 (1957); Billy Baxter, Inc. v. Coca-Cola Co., 431 F. 2d 183 (CA2 1970), cert. denied, 401 U. S. 923 (1971); Kauffman v. Dreyfus Fund, Inc., 434 F. 2d 727, 732-734 (CA3 1970), cert. denied, 401 U. S. 974 (1971); South Carolina Council v. Newton, 360 F. 2d 414, 419 (CA4), cert. denied, 385 U. S. 934 (1966); Dailey v. Quality School Plan, Inc., 380 F. 2d 484 (CA5 1967); Volasco Products Co. v. Lloyd A. Fry Roofing Co., 308 F. 2d 383, 395 (CA6 1962), ce…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ralph Shinaberry
v.
United States of America, Acting Through the County Production and Marketing Administration Committee for Hillsdale County, State of Michigan, Hillsdale, Michigan
12976_1.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
Mar 6, 1957.
242 F.2d 758
Published

242 F.2d 758

Ralph SHINABERRY, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, acting through the County Production and Marketing Administration Committee for Hillsdale County, State of Michigan, Hillsdale, Michigan, Appellee.

No. 12976.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

March 6, 1957.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan; Thomas F. McAllister, Circuit Judge, and Raymond W. Starr and W. Wallace Kent, District Judges.

George A. Meekison, Napoleon, Ohio, for appellant.

Wendell A. Miles, U. S. Atty., Grand Rapids, Mich., for appellee.

Before SIMONS, Chief Judge, and MARTIN and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

Without attempting to avail himself of the administrative remedies provided in the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938, as amended, 7 U.S.C.A. § 1281 et seq., the appellant brought this action to restrain the United States from collecting penalties for violation of the statutes fixing wheat quotas, alleging that those statutes violated the Constitution.

2

It was the appellant's contention that the provisions of 28 U.S.C.A. § 2410(a) conferred upon the district court jurisdiction to entertain the action. The court held that section of the Code inapplicable, concluded that the United States has not consented to be sued in an action such as this, and accordingly dismissed the complaint. D.C., 142 F.Supp. 413 (1956).

3

For the reasons stated in the district court's opinion, the order of dismissal is affirmed.