Nat'l Boulevard Bank of Chicago v. Meyer Schwartz, 274 F.2d 823 (2d Cir. 1960). · Go Syfert
Search
Nat'l Boulevard Bank of Chicago v. Meyer Schwartz, 274 F.2d 823 (2d Cir. 1960). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
25 citation events (4 in the last 25 years) across 16 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: In the Matter of Herbert W. FIELDS, Jr., Debtor. HARTFORD CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee, v. Herbert W. FIELDS, Jr., Appellant (ca5, 1991-03-21)
Treatment trajectory · 1960 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1960 1993 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) In the Matter of Herbert W. FIELDS, Jr., Debtor. HARTFORD CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee, v. Herbert W. FIELDS, Jr., Appellant
5th Cir. · 1991 · confidence medium
We affirmed the holding that under the Bankruptcy Act, a surety who pays a debtor’s tax liability is subrogated to the taxing authority’s status to prevent the discharge of a claim for unpaid taxes. 274 F.2d at 823.
cited Cited "see" Davis v. Davis (In re Davis)
Bankr. S.D. Ohio · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See, Gilbert v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co., 180 F.Supp. 794 (M.D.Ga.1959), aff’d 274 F.2d 823 (5th Cir. 1960).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
National Boulevard Bank of Chicago
v.
Meyer Schwartz
25856.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Feb 26, 1960.
274 F.2d 823
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

274 F.2d 823

NATIONAL BOULEVARD BANK OF CHICAGO, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Meyer SCHWARTZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 177.

Docket 25856.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued February 3 and 4, 1960.

Decided February 26, 1960.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York; Archie O. Dawson, Judge.

1

Defendant appeals from a summary judgment granted to plaintiff-bank in an action for the recovery of $25,000, the amount of a check erroneously paid over a "stop payment" order.

2

Kenneth S. Oltarsh, New York City (Virginia C. Duncombe and Duncombe, Oltarsh & Schott, New York City, on the brief), for plaintiff-appellee.

3

Hyman Fried, New York City (Abbie Goldstein and Fried, Beck, Tannenbaum & Field, New York City, N. Y., and Edward R. Schwartz of the Bar of District of Columbia, on the brief), for defendant-appellant.

4

Before MEDINA and WATERMAN, Circuit Judges, and MADDEN, Judge, United States Court of Claims.[*]

5

PER CURIAM.

6

The judgment is affirmed on the opinion of Judge Dawson, 175 F.Supp. 74.

Notes:

*

Sitting by designation