Lawrence E. Connelly v. George W. Balkwill, 279 F.2d 685 (6th Cir. 1960). · Go Syfert
Search
Lawrence E. Connelly v. George W. Balkwill, 279 F.2d 685 (6th Cir. 1960). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
46 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 24 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: American Mannex Corporation v. Charlton P. Rozands, Etc. (ca5, 1972-08-22)
Treatment trajectory · 1960 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1960 1993 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." American Mannex Corporation v. Charlton P. Rozands, Etc.
5th Cir. · 1972 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare, e. g., Lyons v. Westinghouse Electric Corp., 2 Cir. 1955, 222 F.2d 184 , cert. den. 350 U.S. 825 , 76 S.Ct. 52 , 100 L.Ed. 737 , and Mach-Tronics Inc. v. Zirpoli, 9 Cir. 1963, 316 F.2d 820 , 833, with Becher v. Contoure Laboratories, Inc., 1929, 279 U.S. 388 , 49 S.Ct. 356 , 73 L.Ed. 752 , and Connelly v. Balkwill, 6 Cir. 1960, 279 F.2d 685 , aff'g 174 F.Supp. 49 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Carter-Wallace, Inc. v. The United States
Ct. Cl. · 1971 · signal: see also · confidence low
See, also, Bickley v. Frutchey Bean Co., 173 F.Supp. 516, 524 (E.D.Mich. 1959), aff’d per curiam, 279 F.2d 685 (C.A. 6, 1960) ; Wheelabrator Corp. v. Fogle, 317 F.Supp. 633 (W.D.La., 1970) ; National Lockwaslier Co. v. George K.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lawrence E. CONNELLY Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
George W. BALKWILL Et Al., Defendants-Appellees
13981_1.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
Apr 14, 1960.
279 F.2d 685
Harold K. Bell, and Robert E. Williamson, Lakewood, Ohio, for appellants., Everett D. McCurdy and Lincoln Reavis of Spieth, Bell & McCurdy, Cleveland, Ohio, on the brief., Charles D. Johnson, of Baker, Hoststler & Patterson, Cleveland, Ohio, for appellees., William B. Brooks, in pro. per., Chicago, 111., E. S. Cummings, Jr. of Cummings & Wyman, Chicago, 111., on the brief.
McAllister, Cecil, O'Sullivan.
Cited by 8 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM.

The above cause coming on to be heard upon the record, the briefs of the parties, and the argument of counsel in open court, and the court being duly advised,

[*686] Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the District Court be and the same is affirmed upon the opinion of Judge McNamee granting Appellees’ motion for summary judgment, reported in Connelly v. Balkwill, 174 F.Supp. 49.