Reading Co. v. Pope & Talbot, Inc. & Merritt-Chapman & Scott Corp., 295 F.2d 40 (3rd Cir. 1961). · Go Syfert
Search
Reading Co. v. Pope & Talbot, Inc. & Merritt-Chapman & Scott Corp., 295 F.2d 40 (3rd Cir. 1961). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
25 citation events across 11 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Three Rivers Rock Company v. M/V MARTIN (moed, 1975-09-30)
Treatment trajectory · 1961 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1961 1993 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see, e.g." Three Rivers Rock Company v. M/V MARTIN
E.D. Mo. · 1975 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also, Reading Co. v. Pope & Talbot, Inc., 192 F.Supp. 663 (E.D.Pa.1961), aff'd. 295 F.2d 40 (3rd Cir. 1961).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Humble Oil & Refining Company v. The Tug Crochet, Her Engines, Etc., and M. L. Crochet Towing Co., Inc., United States of America v. Cargill, Inc., Third Party
3rd Cir. · 1970 · signal: see also · confidence low
Notes: 1 288 F.Supp. 147 (E.D.La.1968) 2 Rule 52(a), Fed.R.Civ.Pro.; McAllister v. United States, 348 U.S. 19 , 75 S.Ct. 6 , 99 L.Ed. 20 (1954); Byrd v. M/V Yozgat, 420 F.2d 954 (5th Cir. 1969); East-West Towing Company v. National Marine Service, Inc., 417 F.2d 1274 , (5th Cir. 1969); Hart v. Blakemore, 410 F.2d 218 (5th Cir. 1969) 3 Hart v. Blakemore, 410 F.2d 218 (5th Cir. 1969) 4 Bisso v. Waterways Transportation Co., 235 F.2d 741 (5th Cir. 1956) 5 33 CFR 62.15.1; 33 CFR 62.25.55; see also the cautionary notes in the Light List, Vol. II, Atlantic and Gulf Coast of the United States, CG-160…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. The Tug Crochet
5th Cir. · 1970 · signal: see also · confidence low
CG-160; and Bowditch, American Practical Navigator, p. 266 (1958). . 33 U.S.C.A. §§ 2.10-5 (a) and 2.20-5(a) (Supp.1969); see also Reading Co. v. Pope & Talbot, Inc., 192 F.Supp. 663 (ED Penn.1961), aff’d 295 F.2d 40 (3d Cir. 1961). .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Marine Contracting & Towing Co. v. McMeekin Construction Co.
D.S.C. · 1969 · signal: see also · confidence low
See, also, Reading Co. v. Pope & Talbot, Inc. (D.C.Pa.1961) 192 F.Supp. 663, 665-666 , aff. 295 F.2d 40 , where the collision occurred when the libellant’s vessel was some 175 to 200 yards outside the dredged channel though its pilot had thought erroneously he was within the dredged area.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Reading Company
v.
Pope & Talbot, Inc. And Merritt-Chapman & Scott Corporation
13603_1.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Oct 25, 1961.
295 F.2d 40
Published

295 F.2d 40

READING COMPANY, Appellant
v.
POPE & TALBOT, INC. and Merritt-Chapman & Scott Corporation.

No. 13603.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued Oct. 17, 1961.
Decided Oct. 25, 1961.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania; C. William Kraft, Jr., Judge.

Harrison G. Kildare, Philadelphia Pa. (Rawle & Henderson, Philadelphia, Pa., Thomas F. Mount, J. Welles Henderson, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellant.

Elmer C. Maddy, New York City (Krusen, Evans & Shaw, Philadelphia, Pa., and Kirlin, Campbell & Keating, Roy C. Megargel, New York City, Claus G. U. Claesson, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellee Pope & Talbot, Inc.

Before KALODNER, HASTIE and GANEY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

Upon review of the record we find no error.

2

The Interlocutory Decree of the District Court of March 30, 1961, 192 F.Supp. 663, will be affirmed.