James W. Hawkins v. United States, 302 F.2d 191 (D.C. Cir. 1962). · Go Syfert
Search
James W. Hawkins v. United States, 302 F.2d 191 (D.C. Cir. 1962). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
15 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: John F. Banzhaf, III v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Wtrf-Tv, Inc. And National Association of Broadcasters, American Broadcasting Companies, Inc., the Tobacco Institute, Inc., the American Tobacco Company, Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., Larus & Brother Co., Inc., Liggett & Myers Tobacco Co., Philip Morris, Inc., R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., United States Tobacco Co., P. Lorillard Co., Intervenors. Wtrf-Tv, Inc. And National Association of Broadcasters v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Heart Disease Research Foundation, Intervenors. The Tobacco Institute, Incorporated v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America (cadc, 1968-11-21)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see, e.g." John F. Banzhaf, III v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Wtrf-Tv, Inc. And National Association of Broadcasters, American Broadcasting Companies, Inc., the Tobacco Institute, Inc., the American Tobacco Company, Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., Larus & Brother Co., Inc., Liggett & Myers Tobacco Co., Philip Morris, Inc., R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., United States Tobacco Co., P. Lorillard Co., Intervenors. Wtrf-Tv, Inc. And National Association of Broadcasters v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Heart Disease Research Foundation, Intervenors. The Tobacco Institute, Incorporated v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
D.C. Cir. · 1968 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also, e.g., Henry v. FCC, 112 U.S. App.D.C. 247, 302 F.2d 191 , cert. denied, 371 U.S. 821 , 83 S.Ct. 37 , 9 L.Ed.2d 60 (1962); Allen B.
cited Cited "see, e.g." Banzhaf v. Federal Communications Commission
D.C. Cir. · 1968 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also, e.g., Henry v. FCC, 112 U.S.App.D.C. 247 , 302 F.2d 191 , cert. denied, 371 U.S. 821 , 83 S.Ct. 37 , 9 L.Ed.2d 60 (1962); Allen B.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
James W. HAWKINS, Appelant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee
16781.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.
Apr 5, 1962.
302 F.2d 191
Mr. James F. Carroll, Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. Herbert S. Thatcher, Washington, D. C. (both appointed by this court), was on the brief, for appellant., Mr. Judah Best, Asst. U. S. Atty., with whom Messrs. David C. Acheson, U. S. Atty., Nathan J. Paulson and Harold H. Titus, Asst. U. S. Attys., were on the brief, for appellee.
Edgerton, Fahy, Per Curiam, Washington.
Published
PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from a conviction of robbery. Counsel appointed by this court contend that certain evidence was erroneously admitted. Appellant’s trial counsel introduced this evidence. We think its admission should not, in the circumstances of this case, lead us to reverse the conviction by virtue of the plain error rule, F.R.Crim.P. [rule] 52 (b), 18 U.S.C.A.

Affirmed.