Paul E. Rhodes v. Norval Houston, 309 F.2d 959 (8th Cir. 1962). · Go Syfert
Search
Paul E. Rhodes v. Norval Houston, 309 F.2d 959 (8th Cir. 1962). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
110 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 38 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Shaw v. City of St. Louis (moctapp, 1983-12-20)
Treatment trajectory · 1963 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1963 1994 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Shaw v. City of St. Louis
Mo. Ct. App. · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See Pusateri v. Johnston, 398 F.2d 327 (3rd Cir.1968), Rhodes v. Houston, 202 F.Supp. 624, 636 (D.Neb.1962), aff’d. 309 F.2d 959 (8th Cir.1962), cert. denied 383 U.S. 971 , 86 S.Ct. 1282 , 16 L.Ed.2d 311 (1966) and Eaton v. Bibb, 217 F.2d 446 (7th Cir.1954), cert. denied 350 U.S. 915 , 76 S.Ct. 199 , 100 L.Ed. 802 (1955).
cited Cited "see" Transamerica Insurance v. Keown
D.N.J. · 1978 · signal: see · confidence high
See, Bancroft v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North America, 203 F.Supp. 49 (W.D.La.), affirmed, 309 F.2d 959 (5th Cir. 1962).
cited Cited "see" State v. Rhodes
Neb. · 1974 · signal: see · confidence high
See, Rhodes v. Houston, 202 F. Supp. 624 , affirmed 309 F. 2d 959 , cert. den. 372 U. S. 909 , 83 S. Ct. 724 , 9 L.
discussed Cited "see" Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company v. Paul E. Rhodes and Harry W. Edmondson, Paul E. Rhodes, Administrator of the Estate of Harry W. Edmondson v. Paul E. Rhodes and Lumbermen Mutual, Paul E. Rhodes v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company, Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company, Cross-Appellant v. Paul E. Rhodes, Cross-Appellee
10th Cir. · 1969 · signal: see · confidence high
See Rhodes v. Houston, D.C., 202 F.Supp. 624 , aff'd per curiam 8 Cir., 309 F.2d 959 , cert. den. 372 U.S. 909 , 83 S.Ct. 724 , 9 L.Ed.2d 719 ; Rhodes v. Meyer et al., D.C., 225 F.Supp. 80 , aff'd 8 Cir., 334 F.2d 709 , cert. den. 379 U.S. 915 , 85 S.Ct. 263 , 13 L.Ed.2d 186 ; Rhodes v. Van Steenberg, D.C., 225 F.Supp. 113 , aff'd 8 Cir., 334 F.2d 709 , cert. den. 379 U.S. 915 , 85 S.Ct. 263 , 13 L.Ed.2d 186 ; Rhodes v. Jones, 8 Cir., 351 F.2d 884 , cert. den. 383 U.S. 919 , 86 S.Ct. 914 , 15 L.Ed.2d 673 , reh. den. 383 U.S. 963 , 86 S.Ct. 1229 , 16 L.Ed.2d 306 . 3 After his unsuccessful litig…
discussed Cited "see" Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. Rhodes
10th Cir. · 1968 · signal: see · confidence high
See Rhodes v. Houston, D.C., 202 F.Supp. 624 , aff’d per curiam 8 Cir., 309 F.2d 959 , cert. den. 372 U.S. 909 , 83 S.Ct. 724 , 9 L.Ed.2d 719 ; Rhodes v. Meyer et al., D.C., 225 F.Supp. 80 , aff’d 8 Cir., 334 F.2d 709 , cert. den. 379 U.S. 915 , 85 S.Ct. 263 , 13 L.Ed.2d 186 ; Rhodes v. Van Steenberg, D.C., 225 F.Supp. 113 , aff’d 8 Cir., 334 F.2d 709 , cert. den. 379 U.S. 915 , 85 S.Ct. 263 , 13 L.Ed.2d 186 ; Rhodes v. Jones, 8 Cir., 351 F.2d 884 , cert. den. 383 U.S. 919 , 86 S.Ct. 914 , 15 L.Ed.2d 673 , reh. den. 383 U.S. 963 , 86 S.Ct. 1229 , 16 L.Ed.2d 306 .
discussed Cited "see" Ambrek v. Clark
E.D. Pa. · 1968 · signal: see · confidence high
See Rhodes v. Houston, 202 F.Supp. 624 (D.Neb. 1962) aff’d, 309 F.2d 959 (8th Cir. 1962); Williams v. Craven, 273 F.Supp. 649 (C.D.Calif.1967); Black v. Stanley, 270 F.Supp. 993 (D.Kansas 1967); Haigh v. Snidow, 231 F.Supp. 324 (S.D.C’alif.1964); Quinnette v. Garland, 277 F.Supp. 999 (C.D.Calif.1967).
cited Cited "see" Christine M. Grunewald, Individually and as of the Will of Henry W. Grunewald, Deceased v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Company, a Missouri Corporation
8th Cir. · 1964 · signal: see · confidence high
See Rhodes v. Houston, 202 F.Supp. 624, 631 (D.Neb.1962), aff’d 309 F.2d 959 (8 Cir.), cert. denied 372 U.S. 909 , 83 S.Ct. 724 , 9 L.Ed.2d 719 .
cited Cited "see" R. W. Agnew v. Richard W. Moody
9th Cir. · 1964 · signal: see · confidence high
See Rhodes v. Houston, 309 F.2d 959 (8th Cir. 1962), affirming 202 F.Supp. 624, 634 (D.Neb.1962) (clerk); Peckham v. Scanlon, 241 F.2d 761, 763 (7th Cir. 1957) (court reporter).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Richard and Mary Guzman v. Western State Bank of Devils Lake, North Dakota, a North Dakota Corporation
8th Cir. · 1975 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Rhodes v. Houston, 202 F.Supp. 624, 636 (D.Neb.) aff’d, 309 F.2d 959 (8th Cir. 1962).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Virgil Norton, Virgil Wesley and James Chapman v. James P. McShane (2×)
5th Cir. · 1964 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also, Rhodes v. Houston, D.Neb.1962, 202 F.Supp. 624, 636 , aff'd per curiam, 8 Cir., 309 F.2d 959 , cert. denied, 372 U.S. 909 , 83 S.Ct. 724 , 9 L.Ed.2d 719 10 Most writers agree that if the Federal Tort Claims Act were amended to allow such suits as the instant one to be brought against the United States, both policy interests would be served.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Paul E. RHODES, Appellant,
v.
Norval HOUSTON Et Al., Appellees
16990.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.
Nov 29, 1962.
309 F.2d 959
Paul E. Rhodes, Howe, Neb., made argument pro se and filed brief., Robert A. Nelson, Special Asst. Atty. Gen., Nebraska, Lincoln, Neb., made argument for appellees and Clarence A. H. Meyer, Atty. Gen., and Dwain L. Jones, Asst. Atty. Gen., of Nebraska were with him on the brief.
Sanborn, Blackmun, Register.
Cited by 53 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the order of the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska dismissing appellant’s complaint. The exhaustive opinion of the trial court (Judge Van Pelt) published at 202 F.Supp. 624 contains a careful and detailed analysis of the essential facts. Judge Van Pelt’s well considered conclusions, which we believe to be correct and with which we concur, are supported by a wealth of authority. On the basis of said opinion, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Also see: Kostal v. Stoner, 10 Cir., 292 F.2d 492, certiorari denied 369 U.S. 868, 82 S.Ct. 1032, 8 L.Ed.2d 87 (4/30/62), rehearing denied 370 U.S. 920, 82 S.Ct. 1559, 8 L.Ed.2d 500 (6/11/62).