green
Positive treatment
4.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1963 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1963
1994
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Metzler v. Vandergriendt
See DeLuna v. United States, 308 F.2d 140 (5th Cir.1962) (which contains an excellent discussion of the history of the development of the right to remain silent), reh’g denied, 324 F.2d 375 (5th Cir.1963).
examined
Cited "see"
Goode v. State
(4×)
See, De Luna v. United States, 324 F.2d 375 (CA5 1963), reh. denied, 324 F.2d 375 (CA5 1963).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Margeson
See De Luna v. United States, 308 F.2d 140 , 1 A.L.R.3d 969 (5th Cir. 1962), rehearing denied 324 F.2d 375 (5th Cir. 1963).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Morant
Compare, e.g., DeLuna v. United States, 308 F. 2d 140 (5th Cir.1962) reh'g den. 324 F. 2d 375 (5th Cir.1963); see also State v. Freeman, 64 N.J. 66, 67-68 , 312 A. 2d 143 (1973) (sufficiency of charge); State v. Pickles, 46 N.J. 542, 566-567 , 218 A. 2d 609 (1966). [12] This is particularly true because Morant claimed that the Barretts, through their father, were trying to defend themselves by implicating Morant.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Warren
See also DeLuna v. United States, 308 F.2d 140 (5th Cir. 1962), reh. denied 324 F.2d 375 (5th Cir. 1963).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Irie E. Leonard, United States of America v. James L. Sarvis
See, e. g., DeLuna v. United States, 308 F.2d 140, 155 (5th Cir. 1962), rehearing denied, 324 F.2d 375 (1963) ; see also Saltzburg, The Harm of Harmless Error, 59 U. Va.L.Rev. 988 (1973) ; Mause, Harmless Constitutional Error: The Implications of Chapman v. California, 53 U.Minn.L.Rev. 519, 519-20 (1969). .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
John Fields v. United States
Compare DeLuna v. United States, 308 F.2d 140 , 1 A.L.R.3d 969 (5th Cir. 1962), rehearing denied, 324 F.2d 375 (1963). 6 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
CRESCENT CREDIT CORPORATION, Appellant,
v.
James CAMERON, as Trustee in Bankruptcy of Albert Kraus, Inc., Appellee
v.
James CAMERON, as Trustee in Bankruptcy of Albert Kraus, Inc., Appellee
20020_1.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Nov 6, 1963.
324 F.2d 375
Albert W. Copeland, J. H. Berman, Montgomery, Ala., for appellant, God-bold, Hobbs & Copeland, Montgomery, Ala., of counsel., George B. Azar, Montgomery, Ala., for appellee, Azar & Campbell, Montgomery, Ala., of counsel.
Rives, Cameron, Wisdom.
Published
PER CURIAM.
The' sole question presented is whether the district court was clearly erroneous in finding that Mercantile Paper Company extended credit to Albert Kraus, Inc., rather than to Albert Kraus individually. A reading of the record convinces us that the district court was not clearly erroneous, indeed, that it was not erroneous at all. The judgment is
Affirmed.