Vincent A. Sheehy III v. Edwin H. Estes, 324 F.2d 502 (5th Cir. 1963). · Go Syfert
Search
Vincent A. Sheehy III v. Edwin H. Estes, 324 F.2d 502 (5th Cir. 1963). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
15 citation events across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Salvatore J. Pacilio v. The Pennsylvania Railroad Company (ca2, 1967-06-20)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see, e.g." Salvatore J. Pacilio v. The Pennsylvania Railroad Company
2d Cir. · 1967 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Galley v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co., 324 F.2d 502 (2d Cir.), affirming per curiam, 220 F.Supp. 190 (S.D.N.Y.1963); Satterfield v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co., 323 F.2d 783 (2d Cir. 1963).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Vincent A. SHEEHY III, Et Al., Appellants,
v.
Edwin H. ESTES, Appellee
20504.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Dec 18, 1963.
324 F.2d 502
William M. Acker, Jr., Kenneth R. Cain, Birmingham, Ala., W. Bruce White, Birmingham, Ala. (Smyer, White, Reid & Acker, Markstein & Cain, Birmingham, Ala., of counsel), for appellants., Leigh M. Clark, Lucien D. Gardner, Jr., Birmingham, Ala., James F. Hinton, Jack W. Torbert, Gadsden, Ala. (Cabaniss & Johnston, Birmingham, Ala., of counsel), for appellee.
Tuttle, Jones, Johnson.
Published
PER CURIAM.

In deciding the plaintiffs’ claim in an action where jurisdiction was based on diversity of citizenship, the district court severed a counterclaim for future disposition, and thereafter entered a judgment, from which this appeal stems, against the appellants. Some of the specifications of error raise questions of Alabama law which we think were properly decided by the district court. The other contentions of the appellants present procedural questions, and as to these we conclude that no error is apparent and no prejudice is shown. The judgment of the district court is

Affirmed.