Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. S. s.bay Belle, James McConnell Trading as McConnell Fuel Oil Co., & Carmen Santonello, Trading as Santell Linen Serv. v. Steam Ship John A. Meseck, 324 F.2d 954 (4th Cir. 1963). · Go Syfert
Search
Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. S. s.bay Belle, James McConnell Trading as McConnell Fuel Oil Co., & Carmen Santonello, Trading as Santell Linen Serv. v. Steam Ship John A. Meseck, 324 F.2d 954 (4th Cir. 1963). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
13 citation events across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: First Nat. Bank & Trust Co., Etc. v. Oil Screw, Etc. (miwd, 1973-11-14)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" First Nat. Bank & Trust Co., Etc. v. Oil Screw, Etc.
W.D. Mich. · 1973 · signal: see · confidence high
See The Bay Belle, 215 F.Supp. 72 at 78 (D.Md., 1963), aff’d. 324 F.2d 954 (4th Cir. 1963); The Fort Orange, 5 F.Supp. 833 at 838 (S.D.N.Y.1963); Bard v. The Silver Wave, 98 F.Supp. 271 at 275 (D.Md., 1951); G.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Oriente Commercial, Inc. v. The American Flag Vessel
4th Cir. · 1975 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Port Welcome Cruises, Inc. v. S. S. Bay Belle, D.C., Md., 215 F.Supp. 72, 86 (1963), aff’d, 324 F.2d 954 (4th Cir. 1963) (failure to return rented property sounds in tort on conversion theory); Potash Co. v. M/V Raleigh, D.C., C.Z., 361 F.Supp. 120 (1973); The Pacific Spruce, D.C., W.D.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Humble Oil & Refining Company
v.
S. s.bay Belle, James McConnell Trading as McConnell Fuel Oil Co., and Carmen Santonello, Trading as Santell Linen Service v. Steam Ship John A. Meseck
9138_1.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Dec 2, 1963.
324 F.2d 954
Published

324 F.2d 954

HUMBLE OIL & REFINING COMPANY, Appellant,
v.
S. S.BAY BELLE, Appellee.
James McCONNELL, trading as McConnell Fuel Oil Co., and
Carmen Santonello, trading as Santell Linen
Service, Appellants,
v.
STEAM SHIP JOHN A. MESECK, Appellee.

Nos. 9137, 9138.

United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.

Argued Nov. 20, 1963.
Decided Dec. 2, 1963.

Marvin C. Wahl, Baltimore, Md. (Wahl & Wahl, Solomon B. Levin, Baltimore, Md., and Warren, Chasan, Leyner & Holland, Jersey City, N.J., on brief), for appellants.

Samuel D. Slade, Philadelphia, Pa. (David H. Rosenbluth, Gilbert W. Oswald, Stradley, Ronon, Stevens & Young, Philadelphia, Pa., and Schnader, Harrison, Segal & Lewis, Philadelphia, Pa., on brief), for appellees.

Before HAYNSWORTH and BRYAN, Circuit Judges, and BARKSDALE, District judge.

PER CURIAM.

1

For the reasons set forth in its opinion filed herein, 215 F.Supp. 72 (1963), the judgment of the District Court in this case is affirmed.

2

Affirmed.