United States v. Rutledge Slattery, 333 F.2d 844 (3rd Cir. 1964). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. Rutledge Slattery, 333 F.2d 844 (3rd Cir. 1964). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
5 citation events across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Harold E. Harrington v. United States (ca1, 1974-10-24)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Harold E. Harrington v. United States
1st Cir. · 1974 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare, Datlof v. United States, 252 F.Supp. 11 (E.D.Pa.), aff’d 370 F.2d 655 (3d Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 387 U.S. 906 , 87 S.Ct. 1688 , 18 L.Ed.2d 624 (1967) with United States v. Slattery, 224 F.Supp. 214 (E.D.Pa.1963), aff’d per curiam, 333 F.2d 844 (3d Cir. 1964). 11 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Rutledge Slattery
14807_1.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Jun 23, 1964.
333 F.2d 844
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

333 F.2d 844

UNITED STATES of America, Appellant,
v.
Rutledge SLATTERY.

No. 14807.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued May 21, 1964.

Decided June 23, 1964.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania; Francis L. Van Dusen, Judge.

Jonathan S. Cohen, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C. (Louis F. Oberdorfer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, David O. Walter, Attorneys, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C., Drew J. T. O'Keefe, U. S. Atty., Sullivan Cistone, Asst. U. S. Atty., on the brief), for appellant.

Rutledge Slattery, Philadelphia, Pa., pro se.

Before KALODNER, GANEY and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

On review of the record we find no error. The District Court's Order for Entry of Judgment will be affirmed, 224 F.Supp. 214.