green
Positive treatment
0.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1964 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1964
1995
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
UNITED STATES of America
v.
Michael J. PEPE, Appellant
v.
Michael J. PEPE, Appellant
14583.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Dec 23, 1964.
John P. Daley, Wilmington, Del. (Robert C. O’Hora, Wilmington, Del., on the brief), for appellant., Stanley C. Lowicki, Asst. U. S. Atty., Wilmington, Del. (Alexander Greenfeld, U. S. Atty., Wilmington, Del., on the brief), for appellee.
Biggs, For-Man, Per Curiam, Smith.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
PER CURIAM.
We have examined carefully the record in this case and have considered the arguments of counsel which have been thoroughly presented and vigorously urged. We can perceive no basis for reversing the judgment. Consequently, it will be affirmed, D.C., 209 F.Supp. 592.