Alleghany Corp. v. Allan P. Kirby, Charles T. Ireland, Jr., & Fred M. Kirby, Randolph Phillips, 340 F.2d 311 (2d Cir. 1965). · Go Syfert
Search
Alleghany Corp. v. Allan P. Kirby, Charles T. Ireland, Jr., & Fred M. Kirby, Randolph Phillips, 340 F.2d 311 (2d Cir. 1965). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
53 citation events (4 in the last 25 years) across 13 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: John M. Hagerty v. Succession of Laura McCloskey Clement (ca5, 1984-12-17)
Treatment trajectory · 1965 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1965 1995 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) John M. Hagerty v. Succession of Laura McCloskey Clement
5th Cir. · 1984 · confidence medium
The appellees in this case have not actually alleged that this appeal has caused unreasonable delay; however, "the courts of appeals quite properly allow damages, attorney’s fees and other expenses incurred by an appellee if the appeal is frivolous without requiring a showing that the appeal resulted in delay." State of Texas v. Gulf Water Benefaction Co., 679 F.2d 85 , 87 n. 1 (5th Cir.1982); Fed.R.App.P. 38 Advisory Committee Notes; see also Cummings v. United States, 648 F.2d 289 , 293 & n. 6 (5th Cir.1981); Dunscombe v. Sayle, 340 F.2d 311, 311 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 814 , 86…
discussed Cited as authority (rule) International Railways of Central America v. United Fruit Company
2d Cir. · 1967 · confidence medium
See Treinies v. Sunshine Mining Co., 308 U.S. 66 , 60 S.Ct. 44 , 84 L.Ed. 85 (1939); Alleghany Corp. v. Kirby, 340 F.2d 311, 312, n. 1 (2 Cir.), cert. granted, Holt v. Alleghany Corp., 381 U.S. 933 , 85 S.Ct. 1772 , 14 L.Ed.2d 698 (1965), dismissed, 384 U.S. 28 , 86 S.Ct. 1250 , 16 L.Ed.2d 335 (1966). 18 .
discussed Cited "see" Jeffrey S. Tomcik v. Highmark Health, a Pennsylvania Corporation
W.D. Pa. · 2025 · signal: see · confidence high
See 18 Charles A. Wright et al., Federal Practice and Procedure § 4470 at 688–89 (1981)(citing Alleghany Corp. v. Kirby, 340 F.2d 311 n.1 (2d Cir. 1965) (where jurisdiction was raised in and decided by the state courts, “and no attempt to secure review by the Supreme Court of the United States was made,” the federal court will not exercise jurisdiction over the later-filed suit).
discussed Cited "see" Baker v. Pataki
2d Cir. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See Alleghany Corp. v. Kirby, 340 F.2d 311, 312 (2d Cir.1965) (in banc) (per curiam), cert. dismissed, 384 U.S. 28 , 86 S.Ct. 1250 , 16 L.Ed.2d 335 (1966); Farrand Optical Co. v. United States, 317 F.2d 875, 886 (2d Cir.1963) (in banc) (per curiam); Drake Bakeries, Inc. v. Local 50, Am.
discussed Cited "see" Baker v. Pataki
2d Cir. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See Alleghany Corp. v. Kirby, 340 F.2d 311, 312 (2d Cir.1965) (in banc) (per curiam), cert. dismissed, 384 U.S. 28 , 86 S.Ct. 1250 , 16 L.Ed.2d 335 (1966); Farrand Optical Co. v. United States, 317 F.2d 875, 886 (2d Cir.1963) (in banc) (per curiam); Drake Bakeries, Inc. v. Local 50, Am.
cited Cited "see" Coghlan v. Starkey
5th Cir. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See Fed.R.App.P. 38 advisory committee note (citing Dunscombe v. Sayle, 340 F.2d 311 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 814 , 86 S.Ct. 32 , 15 L.Ed.2d 62 (1965)).
cited Cited "see" Coghlan v. Starkey
5th Cir. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See Fed.R.App.P. 38 advisory committee note (citing Dunscombe v. Sayle, 340 F.2d 311 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 814 , 86 S.Ct. 32 , 15 L.Ed.2d 62 (1965)).
discussed Cited "see" Kenneth L. Waters v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
11th Cir. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See Dunscombe v. Sayle, 340 F.2d 311 (5th Cir., 1965), cert. den., 382 U.S. 814 , 86 S.Ct. 32 , 15 L.Ed.2d 62 (1965); Lowe v. Willacy, 239 F.2d 179 (9th Cir., 1956); Griffith Wellpoint Corp. v. Munro-Langstroth, Inc., 269 F.2d 64 (1st Cir., 1959); Ginsberg v. Stern, 295 F.2d 698 (3d.
cited Cited "see" State of Texas v. Gulf Water Benefaction Co. And Robert E. Pine, Individually and in His Proper Capacity as Trustee, Etc.
5th Cir. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See Dunscombe v. Sayle, 340 F.2d 311 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 814 , 86 S.Ct. 32 , 15 L.Ed.2d 62 (1965) ....
discussed Cited "see" Exhibitors Poster Exchange, Inc. v. National Screen Service Corp.
E.D. La. · 1978 · signal: see · confidence high
See Dunscombe v. Sayle, (5 Cir. 1965), 340 F.2d 311 , cert, den., 382 U.S. 814 , 86 S.Ct. 32 , 15 L.Ed.2d 62 ; Lowe v. Willacy, (9 Cir. 1956), 239 F.2d 179 , 9 Alaska 499 ; Griffin Wellpoint Corp. v. Munro-Langstroth Inc., (1 Cir. 1959), 269 F.2d 64 ; Ginsburg v. Stern, (3 Cir. 1961), 295 F.2d 698 .. . ” Various courts have referred to and utilized F.R.A.P. 38 and 28 U.S.C. § 1912 interchangeably.
discussed Cited "see" Phillips v. Investors Diversified Services, Inc. (2×)
S.D.N.Y. · 1976 · signal: see · confidence high
See Alleghany Corp. v. Kirby, 218 F.Supp. 164, 173-79 (S.D.N.Y. 1963), aff’d, 333 F.2d 327 (2d Cir. 1964), aff’d on rehearing en banc, 340 F.2d 311 (2d Cir. 1965), cert. dismissed, 384 U.S. 28 , 86 S.Ct. 1250 , 16 L.Ed.2d 335 (1966).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Seven Investments, LLC v. AD Capital, LLC
Del. Ch. · 2011 · signal: see also · confidence low
Were this not the case, no party could ever settle a fraud claim with any finality.” (citation omitted)); see also Alleghany Corp. v. Kirby, 333 F.2d 327, 333 (2d Cir.1964), aff’d on reh’g, 340 F.2d 311 (1965) (en banc; per curiam), cert. dismissed, 384 U.S. 28 , 86 S.Ct. 1250 , 16 L.Ed.2d 335 (1966) ("A settlement is the price of peace.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Nycal Corp. v. INOCO PLC
S.D.N.Y. · 1997 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Alleghany Corp. v. Kirby, 333 F.2d 327 (2d Cir.1964), aff 'd on rehearing, 340 F.2d 311 (1965) (en banc; per curiam), cert. dismissed, 384 U.S. 28 , 86 S.Ct. 1250 , 16 L.Ed.2d 335 (1966); Sotheby's, Inc. v. Dumba, No. 90 Civ. 6458(KMW), 1992 WL 27043 , *8-9 (S.D.N.Y.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." The Dow Chemical Company v. M/v Gulf Seas, Its Tackle, Etc., in Rem, Gulf Mississippi Marine Corporation
5th Cir. · 1979 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also, Dunscombe v. Sayle, 5 Cir. 1965, 340 F.2d 311 (appeal “patently frivolous”; no facts given); Myers v. Velasquez, 5 Cir. 1926, 16 F.2d 111, 112 (appellate issue unsupported by allegations in brief or record).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Leonard J. Furbee v. Vantage Press, Inc
D.C. Cir. · 1972 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., Dunscombe v. Sayle, 340 F.2d 311 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 814 , 86 S.Ct. 32 , 15 L.Ed. 2d 62 (1965) (double costs awarded); A/S Krediit Pank v. Chase Manhattan Bank, 303 F.2d 648 (2d Cir. 1962) ($1000 for attorney’s fee and costs of appeal); Ginsburg v. Stern, 295 F.2d 698 (3d Cir. 1961), cert. denied, 368 U. S. 987 , 82 S.Ct. 603 , 7 L.Ed.2d 525 (1962) ($500 for counsel’s fee and costs); Griffin Wellpoint Corp. v. Munro-Langstoth, Inc., 269 F.2d 64 (1st Cir. 1959) (double costs); Lowe v. Willacy, 239 F.2d 179 (9th Cir. 1956) (double *838 costs and reimbursement for a…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
ALLEGHANY CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Allan P. KIRBY, Charles T. Ireland, Jr., and Fred M. Kirby, Defendants-Appellees, Randolph Phillips, Defendant
28397_1.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Jan 12, 1965.
340 F.2d 311
Townley, Updike, Carter & Rodgers, New York City (Stuart N. Updike, J. Howard Carter, Lee W. Meyer, Ronald S. Daniels, Richard J. Barnes, Peter G. Kelly, New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff-appellant., Donovan, Leisure, Newton & Irvine, New York City (Granville Whittlesey, Jr., James V. Hayes, Robert M. Loeffler, Walter L. Stratton, John J. McCann, Ben Vinar, New York City, of counsel), for defendants-appellees.
Waterman, Moore, Friendly, Smith, Kaufman, Hays, Marshall, Anderson.
Cited by 11 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM.

Subsequent to the filing of the three opinions in this case on May 19, 1964, reported at 333 F.2d 327, plaintiff-appel.lant petitioned for a rehearing by the full court. This petition was granted on July 22, 1964, Chief Judge Lumbard disqualifying himself and not participating. Later, the court having ordered that the rehearing be without oral argument, briefs were submitted by the parties, the last and final brief in rebuttal having been filed on November 9, 1964.

Upon consideration of the petition and subsequently filed memoranda, the court is evenly divided as to proper disposition of the case, for Judges Moore, Kaufman, Marshall and Anderson would affirm the decision below, reported at 218 F.Supp. 164 (S.D.N.Y.1963, Dawson, J.) and Judges Waterman, Friendly, Smith and Hays would reverse that judgment and would remand the case to the district court for further hearing there. [1]

Accordingly, the judgment below is affirmed.

1

. In its reply brief on rehearing in banc appellant points out for the first time that since the claim in the state court suit relating to the exchange of stock was grounded in part on an allegedly false and misleading proxy statement, see § 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78n(a) and SEC Rule X-14A-9, federal jurisdiction existed, see J. I. Case Co. v. Borak, 377 U.S. 423, 84 S.Ct. 1555, 12 L.Ed.2d 423 (1964), and argues that § 27 of the 1934 Act, 15 U.S.C. § 78aa, made such jurisdiction exclusive and rendered the state judgment void. We find it unnecessary to rule on the argument. For, apart from any other factors, the issue of jurisdiction was raised in and decided by the New York courts, Zenn v. Anzalone, 1 App.Div.2d 662, 146 N.Y.S.2d 286 (1955), motions for reargument and for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied, 1 App.Div.2d 773, 149 N.Y.S.2d 213 (1956) ; and no attempt to secure review by the Supreme Court of the United States was made. See Treinies v. Sunshine Mining Co., 308 U.S. 66, 78, 60 S.Ct. 44, 84 L.Ed. 85 (1939). On this the court is unanimous.