Whaley v. Cavanaugh, 341 F.2d 295 (9th Cir. 1965). · Go Syfert
Search
Whaley v. Cavanaugh, 341 F.2d 295 (9th Cir. 1965). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
9 citation events across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Jaso v. Traczyk (innd, 1973-11-19)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see, e.g." Jaso v. Traczyk
N.D. Ind. · 1973 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also, Whaley v. Cavanagh, 237 F.Supp. 900 (DC Cal.1963), affirmed 9 Cir., 341 F.2d 295 , cert. den. 382 U.S. 872 , 86 S.Ct. 102 , 15 L.Ed.2d 110 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Clarence E. Whaley
v.
Edward Cavanaugh (Badge 1024) and Any Person Who Conspired to Deprive of Rights, Privileges and Immunities Guaranteed by the Constitution
19122_1.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Feb 8, 1965.
341 F.2d 295
Published

341 F.2d 295

Clarence E. WHALEY, Plaintiff,
v.
Edward CAVANAUGH (Badge 1024) and Any Person Who Conspired to Deprive Plaintiff of Rights, Privileges and Immunities Guaranteed by the Constitution, et al., Defendants.

No. 19122.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

February 8, 1965.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Southern Division; Albert C. Wollenberg, Judge.

Clarence E. Whaley, in pro. per.

Thomas M. O'Connor, City Atty., George Agnost, Deputy City Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for defendants.

Before MADDEN, Judge of the Court of Claims, and HAMLEY and KOELSCH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

The Judgment of the district court is affirmed for the reasons stated in its memorandum opinion filed November 14, 1963, reported in 237 F.Supp. 900.