Ruby v. Pan Am. World Airways, Inc., 360 F.2d 691 (2d Cir. 1966). · Go Syfert
Search
Ruby v. Pan Am. World Airways, Inc., 360 F.2d 691 (2d Cir. 1966). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
25 citation events (14 in the last 25 years) across 10 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Scheff v. Banks (ca2, 2023-07-25)
Treatment trajectory · 1966 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1966 1996 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Scheff v. Banks
2d Cir. · 2023 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ruby v. Pan Am. 4 World Airways, Inc., 360 F.2d 691 , 691–92 (2d Cir. 1966) (per curiam); see also, e.g., Harper ex rel.
discussed Cited "see" In Re Caribbean Tubular Corporation, Debtor. Caribbean Tubular Corporation v. Herminio Fernandez Torrecillas
1st Cir. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ruby v. Pan American World Airways, Inc., 360 F.2d 691 (2d Cir.1966) (dismissing as moot an appeal from refusal of preliminary injunction; while appeal was pending, district court dismissed underlying action, which dismissal was not appealed); Dempsey v. Guaranty Trust Co., 131 F.2d 103 (7th Cir.1942) (same), cert. denied, 318 U.S. 769 , 63 S.Ct. 761 , 87 L.Ed. 1139 (1943); cf. Runs After v. United States, 766 F.2d 347 (8th Cir.1985) (dismissing as moot an appeal from denial of preliminary injunction; while appeal was pending, district court dismissed underlying action, which dismissal was…
cited Cited "see, e.g." Council for Responsible Nutrition v. James
2d Cir. · 2025 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence medium
See, e.g., Ruby v. Pan American World Airways, Inc., 360 F.2d 691, 691 (2d Cir. 1966) (per curiam); Pierce v. Woldenberg, 498 F. App’x 96 , 97–98 (2d Cir. 2012) (summary order).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Runs After v. United States
8th Cir. · 1985 · signal: see also · confidence low
See, e.g., Janousek v. Doyle, 313 F.2d 916 (8th Cir.1963) (per curiam); see also Ruby v. Pan American World Airways, Inc., 360 F.2d 691 (2d Cir.1966) (per curiam). .
cited Cited "see, e.g." Runs After v. United States
1st Cir. · 1985 · signal: see also · confidence low
See, e.g., Janousek v. Doyle, 313 F.2d 916 (8th Cir.1963) (per curiam); see also Ruby v. Pan American World Airways, Inc., 360 F.2d 691 (2d Cir.1966) (per curiam). 1 The Honorable Donald J.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Charles H. Ruby, as President of the Air Line Pilots Association, International, and the Air Line Pilots Association, International, an Unincorporated Association
v.
Pan American World Airways, Inc., and Flight Engineers' International Association, Paa Chapter, Intervenor-Appellee
30377.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
May 10, 1966.
360 F.2d 691
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

360 F.2d 691

Charles H. RUBY, as President of the Air Line Pilots
Association, International, and the Air Line
Pilots Association, International, an
unincorporated association,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
PAN AMERICAN WORLD AIRWAYS, INC., Defendant-Appellee, and
Flight Engineers' International Association, PAA
Chapter, Intervenor-Appellee.

No. 401, Docket 30377.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Submitted May 4, 1966.
Decided May 10, 1966.

Cohen & Weiss, New York City (Henry Weiss, Herbert A. Levy and Robert S. Savelson, New York City, on the brief), for plaintiffs-appellants.

Poletti, Freidin, Prashker, Feldman & Gartner, New York City (Jesse Freidin, Murray Gartner and Edward R. Cohen, New York City, on the brief), for defendant-appellee.

Daniel Kornblum and O'Donnell & Schwartz, New York City (Asher W. Schwartz and Daniel Kornblum, New York City, on the brief), for intervenor-appellee.

Before SMITH, KAUFMAN and FEINBERG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

After this appeal had been taken from Judge Levet's denial of a preliminary injunction, D.C., 525 F.Supp. 393, Judge Murphy dismissed the complaint in this case, in the exercise of his sound discretion, on the ground that a prior action (65 Civ. 2870) 252 F.Supp. 873, pending, as Judge Murphy stated 'between the 'same' parties' would dispose of all the issues raised in this action. The appeal has become moot and is, accordingly, dismissed.[1] See Janousek v. Doyle, 313 F.2d 916 (8th Cir. 1963); Dempsey v. Guaranty Trust Co. of N.Y., 131 F.2d 103 (7th Cir. 1942); but cf. Stell v. Savannah-Chatham Board of Education, 333 F.2d 55 (5th Cir.), cert. denied sub nom. Roberts v. Stell, 379 U.S. 933, 85 S.Ct. 332, 13 L.Ed.2d 344 (1964).

1

In the interest of efficient judicial administration, we note that Judge Levet did not abuse his discretion in denying plaintiffs' application for a preliminary injunction. Accordingly, we suggest to the parties and the District Court that they proceed promptly with the prior pending case and to a determination of which agreement between Pan American and the Air Line Pilots Association, International, or between Pan American and the Flight Engineers' International Association, PAA Chapter, is controlling on the question of whether the so-called 'new hires' are required to pay dues to FEIA, as a condition of remaining in the employ of Pan American as flight engineers. Once this question is resolved, if a 'minor' dispute still remains in the case over the interpretation of the language of the governing agreement, it should be settled by the System Board to Adjustment