Bridge Corp. of Am. v. The Am. Contract Bridge League, Inc., 366 F.2d 779 (9th Cir. 1966). · Go Syfert
Bridge Corp. of Am. v. The Am. Contract Bridge League, Inc., 366 F.2d 779 (9th Cir. 1966). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
5 citation events across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. State National Bank (ca2, 1970-01-29)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" United States v. State National Bank
2d Cir. · 1970 · signal: see · confidence high
See Cutler v. American Federation of Musicians of United States and Canada, 231 F.Supp. 845, 849 (S.D.N.Y.1964), aff’d 366 F.2d 779 (2nd Cir.1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 993 , 87 S.Ct. 1309 , 18 L.Ed.2d 338 (1967).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. The State National Bank Of Connecticut
2d Cir. · 1970 · signal: see · confidence high
See Cutler v. American Federation of Musicians of United States and Canada, 231 F. Supp. 845, 849 (S.D.N.Y.1964), aff'd 366 F.2d 779 (2nd Cir.1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 993 , 87 S.Ct. 1309 , 18 L.Ed.2d 338 (1967). 14 We hold that a disinterested bank-stakeholder is not entitled to attorney's fees from a fund when the total amount in the fund is insufficient to satisfy prior federal tax liens.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
BRIDGE CORPORATION OF AMERICA, Appellant,
v.
the AMERICAN CONTRACT BRIDGE LEAGUE, INC., Et Al., Appellees
20756.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Oct 12, 1966.
366 F.2d 779
Fred Flam, Richard T. Drukker, Wm. G. Tucker, Chase, Rotchford, Downen & Drukker, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant., Julian O. von Kalinowski, Paul G. Bower, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellees.
Chambers, Barnes, Powell.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
PER CURIAM.

We conclude the allegations of the first two causes of action in plaintiff’s amended complaint are sufficient to describe interstate commerce of a type not necessarily exempted from the thrust of federal and state antitrust statutes; and that the third cause of action does not contain allegations on its face which preclude plaintiff from raising issues of fact with respect thereto.

The dismissal of the three causes of action is reversed and the matter remanded for further proceedings consistent with this order.