Clarence Madsen, (Cross-Appellants) v. Chrysler Corp. & Chrysler Motors Corp., (Cross-Appellees), 375 F.2d 773 (7th Cir. 1967). · Go Syfert
Search
Clarence Madsen, (Cross-Appellants) v. Chrysler Corp. & Chrysler Motors Corp., (Cross-Appellees), 375 F.2d 773 (7th Cir. 1967). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
30 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 22 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Bray v. QFA ROYALTIES LLC (cod, 2007-05-03)
Treatment trajectory · 1967 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1967 1996 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Bray v. QFA ROYALTIES LLC
D. Colo. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See Madsen v. Chrysler Corp., 261 F.Supp. 488, 507 (N.D.Ill.1966), vacated as moot, 375 F.2d 773 (7 Cir.1967).
cited Cited "see" Associated Producers v. City of Independence, Mo.
W.D. Mo. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See Madsen v. Chrysler Corp., 261 F.Supp. 488, 507 (N.D.Ill.1966), vacated as moot, 375 F.2d 773 (7 Cir.1967).
discussed Cited "see" Aba Distributors, Inc., Cross-Appellant v. Adolph Coors Company, Cross-Appellee (2×)
8th Cir. · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
See Madsen v. Chrysler Corp., 261 F.Supp. 488, 507 (N.D.Ill.1966), vacated as moot, 375 F.2d 773 (7 Cir. 1967).
cited Cited "see" Semmes Motors, Inc., Suing on Behalf of Itself and Together With Ford Dealers Alliance, Inc., Etc. v. Ford Motor Company
2d Cir. · 1970 · signal: see · confidence high
See Madsen v. Chrysler Corp., 261 F.Supp. 488, 507 (N.D.Ill.1966), vacated as moot, 375 F. 2d 773 (7 Cir. 1967).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Autohaus Brugger, Inc. v. Saab Motors, Inc., and Saab-Scania of America, Inc.
9th Cir. · 1978 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., the reasoning of Judge Will in Madsen v. Chrysler Corp., 261 F.Supp. 488 (N.D.Ill.1966), vacated as moot, 375 F.2d 773 (7th Cir. 1967).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Moto-Sports, Inc. v. Gulf States Toyota, Inc.
S.D. Tex. · 1971 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare the facts here with Madsen v. Chrysler Corp., 261 F.Supp. 488 (N.D.Ill.1966), vacated as moot, 375 F.2d 773 (7th Cir. 1967).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Clarence Madsen, (Cross-Appellants)
v.
Chrysler Corporation and Chrysler Motors Corporation, (Cross-Appellees)
16079.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.
Mar 9, 1967.
375 F.2d 773
Published

375 F.2d 773

Clarence MADSEN et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees (Cross-Appellants),
v.
CHRYSLER CORPORATION and Chrysler Motors Corporation, Defendants-Appellants (Cross-Appellees).

No. 16078.

No. 16079.

United States Court of Appeals Seventh Circuit.

March 9, 1967.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division; Hubert L. Will, Judge.

Theodore A. Groenke, Chicago, Ill., for Clarence Madsen.

George B. Christensen, Chicago, Ill., for Chrysler Corp.

Before HASTINGS, Chief Judge, and SWYGERT and FAIRCHILD, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

1

This matter comes before the Court on the motion of Chrysler Corporation and Chrysler Motors Corporation to reverse judgment and remand cause with directions to dismiss complaint on the grounds of mootness, and the answer of counsel for Clarence Madsen, et al. to said motion.

2

On consideration whereof, it is hereby ordered and adjudged by this Court that the final judgment in this cause entered by the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, 261 F.Supp. 488, be, and the same is hereby vacated, and that this cause be, and the same is hereby remanded to the said District Court with directions to dismiss the complaint, without prejudice and without costs, the controversy being moot.