green
Positive treatment
4.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1968 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1968
1997
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee, and Chevron Oil Company, Additional Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees v. Leo Buras, Jr., (1-26)-Appellees-Cross-Appellants v. Philibert Buras, Intervenors-Appellants
See 380 F.2d 375 And see especially Hopkins v. Lockheed Aircraft Corp., 5 Cir., 1966, 358 F.2d 347 in which the Court certified to the Supreme Court of Florida the controlling question of the dollar limitation on damages for wrongful death, a problem presenting fundamental and serious questions of state policy with only fragmentary case materials with which to work.
cited
Cited "see"
Eusebio M. Martinez, Father of Jacqueline M. Martinez, a Minor, Deceased v. Jose Rodriquez and Antonio Rodriquez, D/B/A Ingram Court Apartments
See 380 F.2d 375 .
discussed
Cited "see"
W. S. Ranch Company, a New Mexico Corporation v. Kaiser Steel Corporation, a Nevada Corporation
(2×)
See 380 F.2d 375 And see especially Hopkins v. Lockheed Aircraft Corp., 5 Cir., 1966, 358 F. 2d 347 in which the Court certified to the Supreme Court of Florida the controlling question of the dollar limitation on damages for wrongful death, a problem presenting fundamental and serious questions of state policy with only fragmentary case materials with which to work.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
UNITED STATES of America Ex Rel. Joseph MAZEWSKI, Appellant,
v.
D. N. MYERS, Superintendent
v.
D. N. MYERS, Superintendent
16496.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Jun 30, 1967.
Joseph Mazewski, pro se., Richard S. Lowe, Dist. Atty., Richard A. Devlin, Asst. Dist. Atty., Norristown, Pa. (Henry T. Crocker, Asst. Dist. Atty., Norristown, Pa., on the brief), for ap-pellee.
Kalodner, Hastie, Van Dusen.
Published
OPINION OF THE COURT
PER CURIAM.On review of the record we find no error. The Order of the District Court denying the appellant’s petition for writ of habeas corpus will be affirmed for the reasons stated in Judge Luongo’s Memorandum and Order of January 4, 1967, 270 F.Supp. 822.