Charlie L. Henderson v. The Arundel Corp., a Body Corp., Charlie L. Henderson v. The Arundel Corp., Peter Bershesky v. Elder Dempster, Charlie L. Henderson v. Elder Dempster, Peter Bershesky v. The Arundel Corp., a Body Corp., Peter Bershesky v. The Arundel Corp., 384 F.2d 998 (4th Cir. 1967). · Go Syfert
Search
Charlie L. Henderson v. The Arundel Corp., a Body Corp., Charlie L. Henderson v. The Arundel Corp., Peter Bershesky v. Elder Dempster, Charlie L. Henderson v. Elder Dempster, Peter Bershesky v. The Arundel Corp., a Body Corp., Peter Bershesky v. The Arundel Corp., 384 F.2d 998 (4th Cir. 1967). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
24 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 13 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: McConnell v. Caterpillar Tractor Co. (njd, 1986-11-07)
Treatment trajectory · 1967 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1967 1996 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" McConnell v. Caterpillar Tractor Co.
D.N.J. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See Henderson v. Arundel Corp., 262 F.Supp. 152 (D.Md.1966), aff’d, 384 F.2d 998 (4th Cir.1967); Casado v. Schooner Pilgrim, Inc., 171 F.Supp. 78 (D.Mass.1959). 5 .
cited Cited "see" Miller Industries, Cross-Appellants v. Caterpillar Tractor Co., Burford Equipment Co., Defendant-Cross-Appellee
11th Cir. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See Henderson v. Arundel Corp., 262 F.Supp. 152 (D.Md.1966), aff 'd 384 F.2d 998 (4th Cir.1967); Casado v. Schooner Pilgrim, Inc., 171 F.Supp. 78 (D.Mass.1959).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." George Manetas v. International Petroleum Carriers, Inc.
3rd Cir. · 1976 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Henderson v. Arundel Corp., 262 F.Supp. 152 (D.Md.1966), aff'd, 384 F.2d 998 (4th Cir. 1967); Lunquist v. SS Seatrain Maryland, 359 F.Supp. 663 (D.Md.1973). 40 Based on the foregoing authorities, we are in agreement with the district court's holding that "(t)he Carib Sun had been so damaged by the perils of the sea that it was incapable of further voyaging" and "(i)t was . . . a wreck" within 46 U.S.C.A. § 593 . 41 We disagree, however, with the district court's entry of summary judgment against the plaintiffs with respect to their "overtime" claims.
cited Cited "see, e.g." Manetas v. International Petroleum Carriers, Inc.
3rd Cir. · 1976 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Henderson v. Arundel Corp., 262 F.Supp. 152 (D.Md.1966), aff’d, 384 F.2d 998 (4th Cir. 1967); Lunquist v. SS Seatrain Maryland, 359 F.Supp. 663 (D.Md. 1973).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Charlie L. Henderson
v.
The Arundel Corporation, a Body Corporate, Charlie L. Henderson v. The Arundel Corporation, Peter Bershesky v. Elder Dempster, Charlie L. Henderson v. Elder Dempster, Peter Bershesky v. The Arundel Corporation, a Body Corporate, Peter Bershesky v. The Arundel Corporation
11332-11336.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Nov 10, 1967.
384 F.2d 998
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

384 F.2d 998

Charlie L. HENDERSON, Appellant,
v.
The ARUNDEL CORPORATION, a body corporate, Appellee.
Charlie L. HENDERSON, Appellee,
v.
The ARUNDEL CORPORATION, Appellant.
Peter BERSHESKY et al., Appellants,
v.
Elder DEMPSTER, Appellee.
Charlie L. HENDERSON, Appellant,
v.
Elder DEMPSTER, Appellee.
Peter BERSHESKY et al., Appellants,
v.
The ARUNDEL CORPORATION, a body corporate, Appellee.
Peter BERSHESKY et al., Appellees,
v.
The ARUNDEL CORPORATION, Appellant.

Nos. 11332-11336.

United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.

Argued November 8, 1967.

Decided November 10, 1967.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore; R. Dorsey Watkins, Judge.

Joseph F. Lentz, Jr., Baltimore, Md., for appellants in Nos. 11,332, 11,334, 11,335 and 11,336, and appellees in Nos. 11,333 and 11,337.

Southgate L. Morison, Baltimore, Md. (Ober, Williams & Grimes, Baltimore, Md., and Haight, Gardner, Poor & Havens, New York City, on brief), for appellee in Nos. 11,334 and 11,335.

Walter S. Levin, Baltimore, Md. (Henry M. Decker, Jr., Baltimore, Md., on brief), for appellants in Nos. 11,333 and 11,337, and appellee in Nos. 11,332 and 11,336.

Before BOREMAN, Circuit Judge, MARVIN JONES, Senior Judge, U. S. Court of Claims,[*] and CRAVEN, Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

We affirm on the opinion of the district court. Henderson v. Arundel Corporation, 262 F.Supp. 152 (D.Md.1966).

2

Affirmed.

Notes:

*

Sitting by designation