Remco Indus., Inc. v. Toyomenka, Inc. & Bert Gorman, Inc. D/B/A Bert Gorman & Assocs., 397 F.2d 977 (2d Cir. 1968). · Go Syfert
Search
Remco Indus., Inc. v. Toyomenka, Inc. & Bert Gorman, Inc. D/B/A Bert Gorman & Assocs., 397 F.2d 977 (2d Cir. 1968). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
39 citation events (4 in the last 25 years) across 17 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Robert Stigwood Group Limited v. Sperber (ca2, 1972-03-17)
Treatment trajectory · 1968 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1968 1997 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Robert Stigwood Group Limited v. Sperber
2d Cir. · 1972 · signal: see · confidence high
See Remco Industries, Inc. v. Toyomenka, Inc., 286 F.Supp. 948 (S.D.N.Y.1967), affirmed 397 F.2d 977 (2d Cir. 1968).
cited Cited "see" Robert Stigwood Group Ltd. v. Sperber
2d Cir. · 1972 · signal: see · confidence high
See Remco Industries, Inc. v. Toyomenka, Inc., 286 F.Supp. 948 (S.D.N.Y.1967), affirmed 397 F.2d 977 (2d Cir. 1968).
discussed Cited "see" Pic Design Corp. v. Bearings Specialty Co., Inc.
1st Cir. · 1971 · signal: see · confidence high
See Remco Industries, Inc. v. Toyomenka, Inc., 286 F.Supp. 948 (S.D.N.Y.), aff’d, 397 F.2d 977 (2d Cir. 1968) ; 3 Coca-Cola Co. v. Foods, Inc., 220 F.Supp. 101 (D.S.D. 1963); Timken Roller Bearing Co. v. Leterstone Sales Co., 27 F.Supp. 736 (N.D.Ill.1939).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Remco Industries, Inc.
v.
Toyomenka, Inc. And Bert Gorman, Inc. D/B/A Bert Gorman & Associates
32386.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Jun 27, 1968.
397 F.2d 977
Published

397 F.2d 977

REMCO INDUSTRIES, INC., Appellant,
v.
TOYOMENKA, INC. and Bert Gorman, Inc. d/b/a Bert Gorman & Associates, Appellees.

No. 551.

Docket 32386.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued June 19, 1968.

Decided June 27, 1968.

Haynes N. Johnson, and Robertson, Bryan, Parmelee & Johnson, Stamford, Conn. (Roland T. Bryan and Paul L. Bollo, Stamford, Conn., of counsel), for appellant.

Harold Baer, Jr., New York City (William J. Cohen, Joel H. Kagan, Howard B. Weinreich and Guggenheimer & Untermyer, New York City, on the brief), for appellees.

Before MOORE, FRIENDLY and FEINBERG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant, Remco Industries, Inc., initiated the present action against appellees Toyomenka, Inc. and Bert Gorman & Associates for unfair competition and violation of Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a). The complaint which sought a permanent injunction and damages, alleged that appellees were unfairly competing in the sale of a certain toy jeep. A motion for a preliminary injunction enjoining the appellees, during the pendency of the action, from engaging in continued acts of unfair competition and trademark infringement was denied by Hon. Frederick vanPelt Bryan, 286 F.Supp. 948 (S.D. N.Y. April 26, 1968). We affirm for the reasons stated in Judge Bryan's thorough opinion.