United States of Am. Ex Rel. Fred Williams, Jr. v. Alfred T. Rundle, 411 F.2d 794 (3rd Cir. 1969). · Go Syfert
Search
United States of Am. Ex Rel. Fred Williams, Jr. v. Alfred T. Rundle, 411 F.2d 794 (3rd Cir. 1969). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
20 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 12 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Mary Jean Murray (ca10, 1972-07-14)
Treatment trajectory · 1969 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1969 1997 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Mary Jean Murray
10th Cir. · 1972 · signal: see · confidence high
See Sullivan v. United States, 411 F.2d 794 (5th Circuit), affirming the case on the basis of the opinion of the District Court reported in 299 F. Supp. 621 (N.D.Ala.1969), and the eases therein cited.
discussed Cited "see" Billie Matthews and William R. Matthews v. United States
5th Cir. · 1972 · signal: see · confidence high
See Sullivan v. United States, 299 F. Supp. 621 (N.D.Ala.1968), aff’d, 411 F.2d 794 (5th Cir. 1969) (preparation and circulation of flight chart an “operational task” rather than negligent misrepresentation); Ingham v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc., 373 F.2d 227 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 931 , 88 S.Ct. 295 , 19 L.Ed.2d 292 (1967) (FAA controller’s failure to inform incoming aircraft in violation of FAA directive that visibility had changed an “operational task” rather than negligent misrepresentation); United Air Lines v. Wiener, 335 F.2d 379 (9th Cir. 1963), cert. dismissed, 379…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
UNITED STATES of America Ex Rel. Fred WILLIAMS, Jr., Appellant,
v.
Alfred T. RUNDLE
17478.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
May 2, 1969.
411 F.2d 794
John W. Packel, Assistant Voluntary Defender, Defender Ass’n of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellant., Roger F. Cox, Asst. Dist. Atty., Philadelphia, Pa. (Joseph J. Musto, Asst. Dist. Atty., James D. Crawford, Asst. Dist. Atty., Chief, Appeals Division, Richard A. Sprague, First Asst. Dist. Atty., Arlen Specter, Dist. Atty., Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.
Per Curiam.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

[*795] OPINION OF THE COURT

Before KALODNER, FREEDMAN and SEITZ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The District Court denied the relator Williams’ petition for a writ of habeas corpus and this appeal followed.

On review of the record we find no error. The contentions presented on this appeal were thoroughly considered ser-iatum in Judge Fullam’s Memorandum Opinion and Order, 299 F.Supp. 1371 and it would serve no useful purpose to dwell on them here. The factual situation disclosed by the state trial records amply supports Judge Fullam’s denial of habeas corpus relief for the reasons stated in his Memorandum Opinion and Order.

The Order of the District Court will be affirmed.