Trailmobile Div., Pullman Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 415 F.2d 1007 (5th Cir. 1969). · Go Syfert
Search
Trailmobile Div., Pullman Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 415 F.2d 1007 (5th Cir. 1969). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
20 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 8 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corporation v. McA Inc. (ca9, 1983-05-06)
Treatment trajectory · 1969 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1969 1997 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corporation v. McA Inc.
9th Cir. · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See Peter Pan Fabrics, Inc. v. Dan River Mills, Inc., 295 F.Supp. 1366, 1369 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd, 415 F.2d 1007 (2d Cir.1969).
discussed Cited "see" Durham Industries, Inc. v. Tomy Corporation
2d Cir. · 1980 · signal: accord · confidence high
Soptra Fabrics Corp. v. Stafford Knitting Mills, Inc., 490 F.2d 1092, 1093 (2d Cir. 1974); Cynthia Designs, Inc. v. Robert Zentall, Inc., 416 F.Supp. 510, 513 (S.D.N.Y. 1976) (“The question to be answered is not whether there are differences in detail between the copyrighted and accused items when subjected to minute scrutiny, but whether the accused item is so similar to plaintiff’s that an ordinary lay observer would conclude that- one was copied from the other.”) (footnote omitted); see also Concord Fabrics, Inc. v. Marcus Brothers Textile Corp., 409 F.2d 1315, 1316 (2d Cir. 1969) (mi…
cited Cited "see" FISHER-PRICE TOYS, DIV. OF QUAK. O. CO. v. My-Toy Co., Inc.
S.D.N.Y. · 1974 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally, Peter Pan Fabrics, Inc. v. Dan River Mills, Inc., 295 F.Supp. 1366 (S.D.N.Y.), aff’d, 415 F.2d 1007 (2d Cir. 1969) ; Covington Fabrics Corp. v. Artel Products, Inc., supra. 6 .
cited Cited "see" Hub Floral Corporation v. Royal Brass Corporation and Jacob Weinberg, and Ets Tissot & Cie
2d Cir. · 1972 · signal: see · confidence high
See Peter Pan Fabrics, Inc. v. Dan River Mills, Inc., 295 F.Supp. 1366, 1368 (S.D.N.Y.), affd. on opinion below, 415 F.2d 1007 (2d Cir. 1969); Nimmer, Copyright § 49 at 194-96, 207 (1971).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Art Rogers, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Jeff Koons Sonnabend Gallery, Inc., Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees
2d Cir. · 1992 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Peter Pan Fabrics, Inc. v. Dan River Mills, Inc., 295 F.Supp. 1366, 1369 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd, 415 F.2d 1007 (2d Cir.1969).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Trailmobile Division, Pullman Incorporated
v.
National Labor Relations Board
25470_1.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Oct 10, 1969.
415 F.2d 1007
Published

415 F.2d 1007

TRAILMOBILE DIVISION, PULLMAN INCORPORATED, Petitioner,
v.
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent.

No. 25470.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

October 10, 1969.

Petition for Review of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board (Texas case).

Charles M. Lanier, New Orleans, La., Hulse Hays, Jr., Cincinnati, Ohio, Alan E. Harazin, Cincinnati, Ohio, Taft, Stettinius & Hollister, Cincinnati, Ohio, Phelps, Dunbar, Marks, Claverie & Sims, New Orleans, La., for petitioner.

Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N. L. R. B., Washington, D. C., John D. Burgoyne, Atty., N. L. R. B., Washington, D. C., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, for respondent.

Before JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge, and WISDOM, GEWIN, BELL, THORNBERRY, COLEMAN, GOLDBERG, AINSWORTH, GODBOLD, DYER, SIMPSON, MORGAN and CARSWELL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

[*~1007]1

Upon consideration of this cause en banc the Court concludes that the opinion and judgment of the majority of the panel be and the same is hereby affirmed, 5 Cir., 407 F.2d 1006.

[*~1008]2

JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge, and WISDOM, BELL, AINSWORTH, SIMPSON and MORGAN, Circuit Judges, dissent.