green
Positive treatment
3.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1971 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1971
1998
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Dennis Greenman Securities Litigation
See Green v. Occidental Petroleum Corp. 541 F.2d 1335 , 1340 (9th Cir.1976) (citing Mungin v. East Coast Railway, 318 F.Supp. 720, 730 (M.D.Fla.1970), aff'd. per curiam, 441 F.2d 728 (5th Cir.1971)), (C.
discussed
Cited "see"
Namoff v. Lynch
See Green v. Occidental Petroleum Corp. 541 F.2d 1335 , 1340 (9th Cir.1976) (citing Mungin v. East Coast Railway, 318 F.Supp. 720, 730 (M.D.Fla.1970), aff'd. per curiam, 441 F.2d 728 (5th Cir.1971)), (C.
cited
Cited "see"
Jack Reynolds v. National Football League, Charles Young v. National Football League, Marvin Crenshaw v. National Football League
See Mungin v. Florida East Coast Railway Co., 318 F.Supp. 720 (M.D.Fla. 1970), aff’d mem. 441 F.2d 728 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 897 , 92 S.Ct. 203 , 30 L.Ed.2d 175 (1971).
cited
Cited "see"
Abraham Grunin v. International House of Pancakes, a Division of International Industries, Inc., Shapiro, Posell & Pilling and Mitchell S. Shapiro v. International House of Pancakes, a Division of International Industries, Inc., Mark J. Klein v. International House of Pancakes, a Division of International Industries, Inc., David Berger, P. A., Cross-Appellant v. Mark J. Klein, Cross-Appellee
See Mungin v. Florida East Coast R.R., 318 F.Supp. 720, 733-34 (N.D.Fla.1970), aff'd per curiam, 441 F.2d 728 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 897 , 92 S.Ct. 203 , 30 L.Ed.2d 175 (1971).
cited
Cited "see"
Grunin v. International House of Pancakes
See Mungin v. Florida East Coast R.R., 318 F.Supp. 720, 733-34 (N.D.Fla.1970), aff’d per curiam, 441 F.2d 728 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 897 , 92 S.Ct. 203 , 30 L.Ed.2d 175 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Findley v. Blinken (In Re Joint Eastern & Southern District Asbestos Litigation)
Larionoff v. United States, 365 F.Supp. 140 (D.D.C.1973) (group challenge to statutory provision regarding Navy re-enlistment bonuses), aff'd and remanded on other grounds, 533 F.2d 1167 (D.C.Cir.1976) (certification proper), aff'd, 431 U.S. 864 , 97 S.Ct. 2150 , 53 L.Ed.2d 48 (1977); Ames v. Mengel Co., 190 F.2d 344 (2d Cir.1951) (shareholder suit to enjoin sale of unissued stock); see also Mungin v. Florida East Coast R., 318 F.Supp. 720, 730 (M.D.Fla.1970), aff'd, 441 F.2d 728 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 897 , 92 S.Ct. 203 , 30 L.Ed.2d 175 (1971); Walker v. City of Houston, 341 F.Sup…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Williams v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.
See also Mungin v. Florida East Coast Railway Company, 318 F.Supp. 720, 735 (D.C.M.D.Fla. 1970), aff’d 441 F.2d 728 (5 Cir. 1971). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
11 Fair empl.prac.cas. 836, 11 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 10,710
See also Mungin v. Florida East Coast Railway Company, 318 F.Supp. 720, 735 (D.C.M.D.Fla.1970), aff'd 441 F.2d 728 (5 Cir. 1971). 5 Upon reflection it occurs to me that this exculpation of the union may be more apparent than real.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Rota v. Brotherhood of Railway
See, e. g., Mungin v. Florida East Coast Ry., 318 F.Supp. 720 (M.D.Fla.1970), aff’d, 441 F.2d 728 (5th Cir. 1971). .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Nehemiah Mungin, Walter J. Howard
v.
Florida East Coast Railway Company, Inc.
v.
Florida East Coast Railway Company, Inc.
29878.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Apr 19, 1971.
Published
77 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3064, 66 Lab.Cas. P 11,989
Nehemiah MUNGIN et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, Walter J.
Howard et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY COMPANY, Inc., Defendant-Appellee.
No. 29878.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
April 19, 1971.
Frank E. Hamilton, Jr., Thomas A. Capelle, Tampa, Fla., Chris Dixie, Houston, Tex., for plaintiffs-appellants.
Erle Phillips, Fisher & Phillips, William W. Alexander, Jr., Atlanta, Ga. Milledge & Horn, Richard L. Horn, Allan Milledge, Miami, Fla., for plaintiffs-appellees.
Before WISDOM, BELL and AINSWORTH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Affirmed. See Local Rule 21.[1]
1
See NLRB v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 5 Cir., 1970, 430 F.2d 966