green
Positive treatment
10.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1973 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1973
1999
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Harth
United States v. Griffin, 530 F.2d 739, 742-43 (7th Cir. 1976); accord United States v. Peterson, 524 F.2d 167, 178 (2d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1088 , 96 S.Ct. 881 , 47 L.Ed.2d 99 (1976); United States v. Savage, 459 F.2d 60, 61 (5th Cir.1972) (per curiam), vacated on other grounds, 483 F.2d 67 (5th Cir.1973).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. David T. Lace, Roger R. Ducharme, Gary D. Butts, Patricia Eckman, and Glenn Pollack
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Miller, 589 F.2d 1117 , 1132 n.13 (1st Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 958 , 99 S.Ct. 1499 , 59 L.Ed.2d 771 (1979); United States v. Agosto, 502 F.2d 612, 614 (9th Cir. 1974); United States v. Culp, 472 F.2d 459, 461 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 411 U.S. 970 , 93 S.Ct. 2161 , 36 L.Ed.2d 692 (1973); United States v. Savage, 459 F.2d 60, 61 (5th Cir. 1972); United States v. Myers, 378 F.2d 398, 399 (3d Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 847 , 90 S.Ct. 96 , 24 L.Ed.2d 96 (1969); Robbins v. MacKenzie, 364 F.2d 45, 50 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 913 , 87 S.Ct. 215…
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Whitener v. State
We now consider separately the first three cases cited in said footnote in support of the principle stated therein: United States v. Savage, 459 F.2d 60, 61 (5 Cir. 1972); United States v. Curiale, 414 F.2d 744, 747 (2 Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 959 , 90 S.Ct. 433 , 24 L.Ed.2d 423 ; United States v. Boukater, 409 F.2d 537 (5 Cir. 1969).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. William Michael Faruolo and Anthony Bernardez
(2×)
For example, in United States v. Savage, 459 F.2d 60, 61 (1972) (per curiam), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 949 , 94 S.Ct. 1470 , 39 L.Ed.2d 564 (1974), the Fifth Circuit held that “[t]he consent was not rendered involuntary by rea son of the fact that before signing the form the defendant asked the police officer if the officer could get a search warrant and the officer replied ‘Yes, we probably can.’ The officer’s statement was in response to defendant’s inquiry, and it was not a misrepresentation of the facts.” .
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. John Erwin Beck (84-5545) Dale Kerry Madsen (84-5546)
(3×)
See United States v. Savage, 459 F.2d 60 (5th Cir. 1972) (per curiam), vacated and reaff'd, 483 F.2d 67 (5th Cir. 1973) (per curiam), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 949 , 94 S.Ct. 1470 (1974), wherein the Fifth Circuit rejected the same arguments asserted herein.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert Webb
(2×)
See United States v. Savage, 459 F.2d 60 (5th Cir. 1972) (consent not involuntary merely because of presence of armed officers).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jess Harlan White
See United States v. Savage, 459 F.2d 60 (5th Cir.1972), vacated on other grounds and reaffirmed, 483 F.2d 67 (1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 949 , 94 S.Ct. 1470 , 39 L.Ed.2d 564 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Williams
Compare United States v. Savage, 459 F.2d 60 (5th Cir.1972) (consent voluntary where officer advised suspect that police could get a warrant), with Lockwood v. State, 470 So.2d 8221 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985) (consent involuntary where police threatened to remove suspect’s child if not permitted to search).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Rathburn
See, also, United States v. Savage, 459 F. 2d 60 (5th Cir., 1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
The United States of America v. David George Culp
See e. g., United States v. Savage, 459 F.2d 60, 61 (5 Cir. 1972) ; United States v. Curiale, 414 F.2d 744, 747 (2 Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 959 , 90 S.Ct. 433 , 24 L.Ed.2d 424 ; United States v. Boukater, 409 F.2d 537, 538-539 (5 Cir. 1969) ; United States v. Manarite, 314 F.Supp. 607, 612-613 (S.D.N.Y. 1970), aff’d, 448 F.2d 583 (2 Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 947 , 92 S.Ct. 281 , 30 L.Ed.2d 264 ; United States v. Fitzpatrick, 289 F.Supp. 767 (N.D.Utah 1968) ; People v. Ward, 27 Cal.App.3d 218 , 103 Cal.Rptr. 671, 675-676 (1972) ; State v. Douglas, 488 P.2d 1366, 1373-1375 (…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Angelo CARRASQUILLO, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee
29875.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Apr 12, 1972.
Angelo Carrasquillo, pro se., Robert W. Rust, U. S. Atty., Neal R. Sonnett, Asst. U. S. Atty., Miami, Fla., for respondent-appellee.
Brown, Goldberg, Morgan.
Published
PER CURIAM:
The final judgment of the District Court is vacated and the case remanded to the District Court for expeditious reconsideration in light of the principles announced in Vaccaro v. United States, 5 Cir., 1972, 461 F.2d 626; Leary v. United States, 1969, 395 U.S. 6, 89 S.Ct. 1532, 23 L.Ed.2d 57; and Harrington v. United States, 5 Cir., 1971, 444 F.2d 1190.
Vacated and remanded.