green
Positive treatment
4.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1973 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1973
1999
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Sheet Metal Workers' Local 28 of New Jersey Welfare Fund v. Gallagher
See Fiorelli v. Kelewer, 339 F.Supp. 796, 801 (E.D.Pa.1972), affirmed mem., 474 F.2d 1340 (3d Cir.1973).
cited
Cited "see"
Martinez v. United States
Accord Jordan v. United States, 333 F.Supp. 987 (E.D.Pa.1971), aff'd mem., 474 F.2d 1340 (3d Cir.1973).
cited
Cited "see"
Local 50, Bakery Workers Union v. Local 3, Bakery Workers Union
See Fiorelli v. Kelewer, 339 F.Supp. 796 (E.D.Pa.1972), aff'd mem., 474 F.2d 1340 (3d Cir.1973).
cited
Cited "see"
Local 50, Bakery and Confectionery Workers Union, Afl-Cio v. Local 3, Bakery and Confectionery Workers Union, Afl-Cio
See Fiorelli v. Kelewer, 339 F.Supp. 796 (E.D.Pa.1972), aff'd mem., 474 F.2d 1340 (3d Cir.1973).
cited
Cited "see"
Miller v. State
See United States v. Wolfson, 52 F.R.D. 170, 176 (D.Del.1971), affirmed, 474 F.2d 1340 (3d Cir. 1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
Frey v. Woodard
See Caidin v. United States, 564 F.2d 284 (9th Cir. 1977) (failure to specify amount of claim and nature of injuries), Bialowas v. United States, supra (failure to sign form and to specify amount of claim), Avril v. United States, 461 F.2d 1090 (9th Cir. 1972) (failure to specify amount of claim), Ianni v. United States, 457 F.2d 804 (6th Cir. 1972) (failure to specify amount of claim), Johnson v. United States, 404 F.2d 22 (5th Cir. 1968) (failure to submit claim on Standard Form 95), DeGerena v. United States, 398 F.Supp. 93 (D.P.R.1975) (failure to date and specify amount of claim), Kornblu…
discussed
Cited "see"
Alvin E. Harbin v. The Interlake Steamship Company
Accord, Gulledge v. United States, 474 F.2d 1340 (3d Cir. 1973), aff’g, 337 F.Supp. 1108 (E.D.Pa.1972); Kirsch v. United States, 450 F.2d 326 (9th Cir. 1971) (insufficient evidence of savage character where engineer, who committed unprovoked assault with fists over minor disagreement, had had five fights over thirty-year period); Robinson v. S. S. Atlantic Starling, 369 F.2d 69 (5th Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 993 , 87 S.Ct. 1309 , 18 L.Ed.2d 339 (1967) (seaman who stabbed cruel, abusive captain properly found by District Court to be a “quiet, peaceful, efficient seaman”); Connoll…
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, by William Sheppard, Insurance Commissioner v. National Association of Flood Insurers, an Unincorporated Association
Accord Jordan v. United States, 333 F.Supp. 987 (E.D.Pa.1971), aff’d mem., 474 F.2d 1340 (3d Cir. 1973).
cited
Cited "see"
Mascuilli v. American Export Isbrandtsen Lines, Inc.
See Cooper v. Australian Ooastal Shipping Comm’n, 338 F.Supp. 1056 (E.D.Pa.1972), aff’d mem., 474 F.2d 1340 (3d Cir. 1973) ; McNeil v. A/S Havbor, 339 F.Supp. 1264 (E.D.Pa.1972). 10 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Jama v. United States Immigration & Naturalization Service
See also Jordan v. United States, 333 F.Supp. 987, 989-90 (E.D.Pa.1971), aff'd 474 F.2d 1340 (3d Cir.1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Milwee v. Peachtree Cypress Investment Co.
Co., C.A. 7th (1976), 539 F.2d 1107 (where counsel relied upon a statute, allowing 90 days to appeal in admiralty cases, and that statute had been superceded by Rule 4(a), supra); see also Torockio v. Chamberlain Manufacturing Company, D.C.Pa. (1972), 56 F.R.D. 82 , 87—88[7], affirmed C.A.3d (1973), 474 F.2d 1340 (table) (where counsel believed erroneously that a dismissal without prejudice was not final for appellate purposes).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Kates
See, e. g., United States v. Wolfson, 52 F.R.D. 170, 176 (D.Del.1971), affd, 474 F.2d 1340 (3d Cir. 1973). 18 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Alvares v. Erickson
Compare Fiorelli v. Kelewer, E.D.Pa., 1972, 339 F.Supp. 796 , aff’d without published opinion, 3 Cir., 1973, 474 F.2d 1340 , on which the defendant State Trustees rely, where the court technically found jurisdiction but held there was no cognizable § 301(a) claim because the plaintiffs had alleged neither the existence nor the breach of any labor-management contract.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Alvares v. Erickson
Compare Fiorelli v. Kelewer, E.D.Pa., 1972, 339 F.Supp. 796 , aff'd without published opinion, 3 Cir., 1973, 474 F.2d 1340 , on which the defendant State Trustees rely, where the court technically found jurisdiction but held there was no cognizable § 301(a) claim because the plaintiffs had alleged neither the existence nor the breach of any labor-management contract.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ford
v.
Kammerer
v.
Kammerer
72-1236.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Feb 16, 1973.
474 F.2d 1340
Published
Ford
v.
Kammerer
72-1236
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Third Circuit
2/16/73
1
E.D.Pa.
AFFIRMED