Beatrice M. Cawood v. Georgia Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co., 479 F.2d 1044 (5th Cir. 1973). · Go Syfert
Search
Beatrice M. Cawood v. Georgia Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co., 479 F.2d 1044 (5th Cir. 1973). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
25 citation events across 13 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: EE Maxwell Co., Inc. v. Arti Decor, Ltd. (txnd, 1986-06-13)
Treatment trajectory · 1973 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1973 1999 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" EE Maxwell Co., Inc. v. Arti Decor, Ltd.
N.D. Tex. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See Dreyer v. Jalet, 349 F.Supp. 452, 467 (S.D.Tex.1972), aff'd, 479 F.2d 1044 (5th Cir.1973) (no injunctive relief where recovery of damages is adequate remedy), and Marshall Durbin Farms, Inc. v. National Farmers Org.
discussed Cited "see" Rodriguez v. Carroll
S.D. Tex. · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
See Dreyer v. Jalet, 349 F.Supp. 452, 466 (S.D.Tex.1972), aff’d per curiam, 479 F.2d 1044 (5th Cir. 1973). *553 A. ABUSE OF PROCESS To recover for abuse of process, Texas law requires Plaintiff to plead and prove three essential elements: (1) that the defendant make an illegal, improper or perverted use of the process, a use neither warranted nor authorized by the process; (2) that the defendant had an ulterior motive or purpose in exercising such illegal, perverted or improper use of process; and (3) , that damage resulted to Plaintiff as a result of such irregular act.
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Erickson
W.D. Okla. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See Dreyer v. Jalet, 349 F.Supp. 452, 459 (S.D.Tex.1972), aff’d, 479 F.2d 1044 (Fifth Cir. 1973) (per curiam); Roberts v. I-T-E Circuit Breaker Co., 316 F.Supp. 133 (D.Minn.1970); United States v. Pellegrini, 201 F.Supp. 65 (D.Mass. 1962).
cited Cited "see" Edwin C. Covington v. Aubrey Cole, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Sheriff of Jaspercounty, Texas
5th Cir. · 1976 · signal: see · confidence high
See Dreyer v. Jalet, S.D.Tex.1972, 349 F.Supp. 452, 459-60 , aff’d, 5 Cir. 1973, 479 F.2d 1044 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Crawford by and Through Crawford v. City of Kansas
D. Kan. · 1997 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Dreyer v. Jalet, 349 F.Supp. 452, 472 (S.D.Tex.1972), aff'd, 479 F.2d 1044 (5th Cir.1973) (emphasis added) (requiring evidence that individuals engaged in a common purpose over a period of time in order to find conspiracy).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Morales
Tex. · 1994 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Dreyer v. Jalet, 349 F.Supp. 452, 466-67 (S.D.Tex.1972), aff'd without opinion, 479 F.2d 1044 (5th Cir.1973) (citing Passel for the proposition that Texas law sanctions injunctive relief to protect both property and personal rights). 6 .
cited Cited "see, e.g." Ruiz v. Estelle
S.D. Tex. · 1980 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., Dreyer v. Jalet, 349 F.Supp. 452, 474 (S.D.Tex.1972), aff’d 479 F.2d 1044 (5th Cir. 1973); Cruz v. Beto, 603 F.2d 1178 (5th Cir. 1979); Corpus v. Estelle, 551 F.2d 68 (1977).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Richard Franklin Miller v. Dale Carson, Individually and in His Capacity as Sheriff of Duval County, Florida
5th Cir. · 1977 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., Dreyer v. Jalet, S.D.Tex.1972, 349 F.Supp. 452, 489-90 (dictum), aff'd, 5 Cir. 1973, 479 F.2d 1044 (per curiam); Paka v. Manson, D.Conn.1974, 387 F.Supp. 111, 117 (district court found that Corrections Department’s ombudsman had enjoyed “considerable success”); authorities cited in Willis v. Ciccone, 8 Cir. 1974, 506 F.2d 1011 , 1015 n. 4 (ombudsmen and grievance commissions); Prison Ombudsman Provide a Safety Valve, 55 Judicature 314 (1973), cited in McCray v. Burrell, D.Md.1973, 367 F.Supp. 1191, 1207 , rev’d, 4 Cir. 1975, 516 F.2d 357 . .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Beatrice M. Cawood
v.
Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company
73-1635.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Jul 10, 1973.
479 F.2d 1044
Published

479 F.2d 1044

Beatrice M. CAWOOD, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
GEORGIA FARM BUREAU MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 73-1635 Summary Calendar.[*]

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

July 10, 1973.

Daniel C. B. Levy, Atlanta, Ga., for plaintiff-appellant.

Denmark Groover, Jr., Macon, Ga., for Ga. Farm Bureau and others.

Harry S. Baxter, George B. Haley, Jr., Atlanta, Ga., for Southern Farm.

Before THORNBERRY, GOLDBERG and RONEY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

It is ordered that the appeal in the above numbered and entitled cause is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Rule 54(b), F.R.Civ.P.

*

Rule 18, 5 Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Company of New York et al., 5 Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I