O. C. Allen v. L. S. Nelson, Warden, 484 F.2d 960 (9th Cir. 1973). · Go Syfert
Search
O. C. Allen v. L. S. Nelson, Warden, 484 F.2d 960 (9th Cir. 1973). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
22 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 8 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States Ex Rel. Hoss v. Cuyler (paed, 1978-05-01)
Treatment trajectory · 1973 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1973 1999 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" United States Ex Rel. Hoss v. Cuyler
E.D. Pa. · 1978 · signal: see · confidence high
See Allen v. Nelson, 354 F.Supp. 505, 511-12 (N.D.Cal.), aff’d per curiam, 484 F.2d 960 (9th Cir. 1973), quoting Landman v. Royster, 333 F.Supp. 621, 645 (E.D.Va.1971).
cited Cited "see" Fitzgerald v. Procunier
N.D. Cal. · 1975 · signal: see · confidence high
See Allen v. Nelson, 354 F.Supp. 505, 513 (N.D.Cal.1973), aff’d per curiam, 484 F.2d 960 (9th Cir. 1973); Sostre v. McGinnis, 442 F.2d 178, 198, 203 (2d Cir. 1971).
cited Cited "see" Catalano v. United States
D. Conn. · 1974 · signal: see · confidence high
See Allen v. Nelson, 354 F.Supp. 505, 513 (N.D.Cal.), aff’d 484 F.2d 960 (9 Cir. 1973).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Johnson v. Duffy
9th Cir. · 1978 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Allen v. Nelson (9th Cir. 1973) 484 F.2d 960 , adopting the district court’s opinion, reported in 354 F.Supp. 505 .) 3 We have no occasion to reach the question whether the primitive due process envisioned by California Penal Code § 4131 would pass constitutional due process muster, because it is evident from this record that the defendants did not comply with the statute and that Johnson was not accorded any due process at all. 4 Ill Athey contends that the summary judgment should be upheld as to him, in any event, because his affidavit established his good faith defense.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Johnson v. Duffy
9th Cir. · 1978 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Allen v. Nelson (9th Cir. 1973) 484 F.2d 960 , adopting the district court's opinion, reported in 354 F.Supp. 505 .) 3 14 We have no occasion to reach the question whether the primitive due process envisioned by California Penal Code § 4131 would pass constitutional due process muster, because it is evident from this record that the defendants did not comply with the statute and that Johnson was not accorded any due process at all. 4 III 15 Athey contends that the summary judgment should be upheld as to him, in any event, because his affidavit established his good faith defense.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
O. C. Allen
v.
L. S. Nelson, Warden
73-1339.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Oct 9, 1973.
484 F.2d 960
Published

484 F.2d 960

O. C. ALLEN, Petitioner-Appellee,
v.
L. S. NELSON, Warden, Respondent-Appellant.

No. 73-1339.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

Oct. 9, 1973.

Evelle J. Younger, Atty. Gen., Edward A. Hinz, Jr., Chief Asst. Atty. Gen., Doris H. Maier, Edward P. O'Brien, Asst. Attys. Gen., John T. Murphy, Deputy Atty. Gen., San Francisco, Cal., for respondent-appellant.

William Mandel, David T. Alexander, Petty, Andrews, Tufts & Jackson, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner-appellee.

Before BROWNING, TRASK, and CHOY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

For the reasons stated in the district court's opinion (see 354 F.Supp. 505), the court's order is affirmed.