neutral
Cited (no substantive treatment)
0.3 score
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner,
v.
Joseph C. ASHER, D/B/A the Meat Cleaver, Respondent
v.
Joseph C. ASHER, D/B/A the Meat Cleaver, Respondent
73-1724.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Mar 21, 1974.
Corinna Metcalf, Atty., N.L.R.B. (argued), Elliott Moore, Acting Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D. C., Wilford W. Johansen, N.L.R.B., Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner., Max Sisenwein (argued), Sisenwein & Stanton, Charles M. Arak, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent.
Ely, Hufstedler, Per Curiam, Trask.
Published
OPINION
PER CURIAM:The petitioning Board’s Decision and Order is reported at 200 NLRB No. 130. We are not persuaded that the Board’s critical factual determinations were not supported by substantial evidence; therefore, its Order will be
Enforced.