Landis Tool Co. v. N. L. R. B, 497 F.2d 684 (D.C. Cir. 1974). · Go Syfert
Landis Tool Co. v. N. L. R. B, 497 F.2d 684 (D.C. Cir. 1974). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
43 citation events across 9 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: City of Beaver Falls v. Economic Development Administration (pawd, 1977-11-14)
Treatment trajectory · 1974 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1974 2000 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" City of Beaver Falls v. Economic Development Administration
W.D. Pa. · 1977 · signal: see · confidence high
City of Benton Harbor v. Richardson, 429 F.Supp. 1096 (W.D.Mich.1977); see Mil-Ka Ko Research and Development Corp. v. Office of Economic Opportunity, 352 F.Supp. 169, 173 (D.D.C.1972), aff’d. [ 162 U.S.App.D.C. 97 ], 497 F.2d 684 (D.C.Cir. 1974).
cited Cited "see" Relf v. United States
D.D.C. · 1977 · signal: see · confidence high
See Monarch Insurance Co. of Ohio v. District of Columbia, 353 F.Supp. 1249, 1258 (D.D.C.1973), aff’d, 162 U.S.App.D.C. 97 , 497 F.2d 684 (1974).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Industria Panificadora, S.A. v. United States
D.D.C. · 1991 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare, e.g., Monarch Insurance Co. v. District of Columbia, 353 F.Supp. 1249, 1258-1259 (D.D.C.1973) (planning and implementation of a riot control program for use during civil orders is a discretionary function), aff’d, 497 F.2d 684 , cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1021 , 95 S.Ct. 497 , 42 L.Ed.2d 295 (1974), with Downs v. United States, 522 F.2d 990 (6th Cir.1975) (FBI agent’s decision on how to handle an airplane hijacking not a protected act of discretion), and Miller v. United States, 410 F.Supp. 425 (E.D.Mich.1976) (negligent operation of waterworks protected by discretionary function exce…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Landis Tool Company
v.
N. L. R. B
73-1738.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.
Jun 5, 1974.
497 F.2d 684
Published

497 F.2d 684

87 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2127, 162 U.S.App.D.C. 97,
74 Lab.Cas. P 10,094

Landis Tool Company
v.
N. L. R. B.

73-1738

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS District of Columbia Circuit

6/5/74

1

D.C.D.C.

AFFIRMED