green
Positive treatment
1.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1974 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1974
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
City of Beaver Falls v. Economic Development Administration
City of Benton Harbor v. Richardson, 429 F.Supp. 1096 (W.D.Mich.1977); see Mil-Ka Ko Research and Development Corp. v. Office of Economic Opportunity, 352 F.Supp. 169, 173 (D.D.C.1972), aff’d. [ 162 U.S.App.D.C. 97 ], 497 F.2d 684 (D.C.Cir. 1974).
cited
Cited "see"
Relf v. United States
See Monarch Insurance Co. of Ohio v. District of Columbia, 353 F.Supp. 1249, 1258 (D.D.C.1973), aff’d, 162 U.S.App.D.C. 97 , 497 F.2d 684 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Industria Panificadora, S.A. v. United States
Compare, e.g., Monarch Insurance Co. v. District of Columbia, 353 F.Supp. 1249, 1258-1259 (D.D.C.1973) (planning and implementation of a riot control program for use during civil orders is a discretionary function), aff’d, 497 F.2d 684 , cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1021 , 95 S.Ct. 497 , 42 L.Ed.2d 295 (1974), with Downs v. United States, 522 F.2d 990 (6th Cir.1975) (FBI agent’s decision on how to handle an airplane hijacking not a protected act of discretion), and Miller v. United States, 410 F.Supp. 425 (E.D.Mich.1976) (negligent operation of waterworks protected by discretionary function exce…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Landis Tool Company
v.
N. L. R. B
v.
N. L. R. B
73-1738.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.
Jun 5, 1974.
497 F.2d 684
Published
87 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2127, 162 U.S.App.D.C. 97,
74 Lab.Cas. P 10,094
Landis Tool Company
v.
N. L. R. B.
73-1738
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS District of Columbia Circuit
6/5/74
1
D.C.D.C.
AFFIRMED