green
Positive treatment
0.7 score
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Raffoler, Ltd. v. Peabody & Wright, Ltd.
Kolbe Co. v. Armgus Textile Co., 315 F.2d 70, 72 , 137 U.S.P.Q. 9 (2d Cir.1963); see also Baldwin Cooke Co. v. Keith Clark, Inc., 383 F.Supp. 650 , 183 U.S.P.Q. 209 (N.D.Ill.), aff'd per curiam, 505 F.2d 1250 (7th Cir.1974) (planning calendar was copyrightable as an entity although components of it were not individually copyrightable).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
BALDWIN COOKE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
KEITH CLARK, INC., Defendant-Appellant
v.
KEITH CLARK, INC., Defendant-Appellant
74-1570.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.
Nov 4, 1974.
Gordon T. King, Coudert Brothers, New York City, John D. Dewey, Eugene M. Cummings, Chicago, 111., for defendant-appellant., Theodore W. Anderson, Chicago, 111., for plaintiff-appellee.
Tone, Kil-Kenny, Campbell.
Cited by 6 opinions | Published
[*1251] PER CURIAM.
Defendant Keith Clark, Inc. appeals from a District Court judgment and decree enjoining defendant from infringing plaintiff Baldwin Cooke Company’s copyrights on its “Executive Planner.” We affirm the judgment and decree of the District Court and adopt the opinion of that court, Baldwin Cooke Co. v. Keith Clark, Inc., 383 F.Supp. 650 (N.D.Ill.1974).
Affirmed.