green
Positive treatment
2.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1974 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1974
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Bell v. South Bay European Corp.
See Model Code of Professional Responsibility DR 7-102(A) (1 & 2) (1976). 3 The Court went on to observe that “[i]n light of these policy reasons for preventing a lay person from representing a corporation in litigation, the federal courts have, in cases governed by federal law, disapproved any circumvention of the rule by the procedural device of an assignment of the corporation’s claims to the lay individual.” The Court cited with approval Judge Duffy’s decision in Mercu-Ray Industries, Inc. v. Bristol-Myers Co., 392 F.Supp. 16 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd mem., 508 F.2d 837 (2d Cir.1974), in w…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Lupowitz, Inc. v. Eclipse Holdings, Inc.
Id. at 22-23; see also Mercu-Ray Indus., Inc. v. Bristol-Myers Co., 392 F.Supp. 16, 18-20 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd, 508 F.2d 837 (2d Cir.1974).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Morrows Promotions, Ltd.
v.
Hartford Insurance Company
v.
Hartford Insurance Company
74-1751.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Jan 21, 1975.
508 F.2d 837
Published
Morrows Promotions, Ltd.
v.
Hartford Insurance Company
74-1751
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Second Circuit
1/21/75
1
E.D.N.Y.
AFFIRMED