Goudie v. Sears, Roebuck & Co, 527 F.2d 1386 (D.C. Cir. 1976). · Go Syfert
Search
Goudie v. Sears, Roebuck & Co, 527 F.2d 1386 (D.C. Cir. 1976). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
96 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 15 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Dahl v. Clark (nvd, 1984-12-31)
Treatment trajectory · 1976 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1976 2001 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Dahl v. Clark
D. Nev. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See National Resources Defense Council, Inc., v. Morton, 388 F.Supp. 829 (D.D.C.1974), aff'd, 527 F.2d 1386 (D.C.Cir.1976) cert. denied 427 U.S. 913 , 96 S.Ct. 3201 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1204 (1976); Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., v. Andrus, 448 F.Supp. 802 (D.D.C.1978).
cited Cited "see" John L. Faulkner, Laura Jo Faulkner, R. Fred Faulkner, and Susan L. Faulkner v. James G. Watt, Secretary of the Interior
9th Cir. · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
See NRDC v. Morton, 388 F.Supp. 829 (D.D.C.1974), aff’d without opinion, 527 F.2d 1386 (D.C.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." National Audubon Society v. Hoffman
unknown court · 1997 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Sierra Club v. Espy, 38 F.3d at 796 ; compare Ventling v. Bergland, 479 F.Supp. 174, 179-80 (D.S.D.), aff'd mem., 615 F.2d 1365 (8th Cir.1979) (no site-specific EIS required where programmatic EIS was sufficiently detailed), with Manatee County v. Gorsuch, 554 F.Supp. 778, 788 (M.D.Fla.1982) (site-specific EIS required where programmatic EIS was insufficient to cover the environmental effects of the site-specific action); see also Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. Morton, 388 F.Supp. 829, 838, 841 (D.D.C.1974) (requiring site-specific impact statement where programmatic statement …
discussed Cited "see, e.g." National Audubon Society v. Hoffman
unknown court · 1997 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Sierra Club v. Espy, 38 F.3d at 796 ; compare Ventling v. Bergland, 479 F.Supp. 174, 179-80 (D.S.D.), aff'd mem., 615 F.2d 1365 (8th Cir.1979) (no site-specific EIS required where programmatic EIS was sufficiently detailed), with Manatee County v. Gorsuch, 554 F.Supp. 778, 788 (M.D.Fla.1982) (site-specific EIS required where programmatic EIS was insufficient to cover the environmental effects of the site-specific action); see also Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. Morton, 388 F.Supp. 829, 838, 841 (D.D.C.1974) (requiring site-specific impact statement where programmatic statement …
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Bennett Hills Grazing Association v. United States of America (2×)
9th Cir. · 1979 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Natural Resources Defense Council Inc. v. Morton, 388 F.Supp. 829 (D.D.C.1974), aff’d 174 U.S.App.D.C. 77 , 527 F.2d 1386 (1975), cert. denied 427 U.S. 913 , 96 S.Ct. 3201 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1204 (1976) (prior decision in same action).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." The Sierra Club v. Stanley K. Hathaway (2×)
9th Cir. · 1978 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. Morton, 388 F.Supp. 829, 839-41 (D.D.C. 1974), aff’d without opinion, 174 U.S.App.D.C. 77 , 527 F.2d 1386 (1976), cert. denied, 427 U.S. 913 , 96 S.Ct. 3201 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1204 (1976) (held that a BLM programmatic EIS addressing a livestock grazing permit program, standing alone, was insufficient because it did not provide an individualized assessment of the impact on the local environments), with Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. Tennessee Val.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. Administrator, Energy Research & Development Administration (2×)
D.D.C. · 1978 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., NRDC v. Morton, 388 F.Supp. 829, 836-41 (D.D.C.1974), aff’d, 174 U.S.App.D.C. 77 , 527 F.2d 1386 , cert. denied, 427 U.S. 913 , 96 S.Ct. 3201 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1204 (1976); Kelley v. Butz, 404 F.Supp. 925, 938-40 (W.D.Mich.1975).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Goudie
v.
Sears, Roebuck and Co
74-1978.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.
Jan 6, 1976.
527 F.2d 1386
Published

527 F.2d 1386

174 U.S.App.D.C. 77

Goudie
v.
Sears, Roebuck and Co.

74-1978

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS District of Columbia Circuit

1/6/76

1

D.C.D.C.

2

AFFIRMED*