Certified Bldg. Prods., Inc., & Carl Fidler, an Individual v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 528 F.2d 968 (9th Cir. 1976). · Go Syfert
Search
Certified Bldg. Prods., Inc., & Carl Fidler, an Individual v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 528 F.2d 968 (9th Cir. 1976). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
18 citation events (8 in the last 25 years) across 8 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Neumont University, LLC v. Nickles (nvd, 2015-02-09)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) Neumont University, LLC v. Nickles
D. Nev. · 2015 · confidence medium
Id. at 969. .
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Ado Finance, AG v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.
C.D. Cal. · 1996 · confidence medium
Certified Building Products, 528 F.2d at 969 (service upon corporation, which was alter ego of named individual, was equivalent of service upon individual, and thus in personam jurisdiction was obtained of individual); Davis v. Metro Productions, Inc., 885 F.2d 515 , 520- *716 21 (9th Cir.1989) (corporate form may be ignored in eases in which the corporation isthe agent or alter ego of the individual defendant or where there is an identity of interests between the corporation and the individuals); Flynt Distributing Company, Inc. v. Harvey, 734 F.2d 1389, 1393 (9th Cir.1984), citing Sheard v. …
cited Cited "see" Sun First National Bank of Orlando v. Miller
S.D.N.Y. · 1978 · signal: see · confidence high
Ibid; see Certified Building Products, Inc. v. N.L.R.B., 528 F.2d 968 (9th Cir. 1976); Holfield v. Power Chemical Corp., 382 F.Supp. 388 (D.Md.1974).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Certified Building Products, Inc., and Carl Fidler, an Individual
v.
National Labor Relations Board
74--2777.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Jan 23, 1976.
528 F.2d 968
Published

528 F.2d 968

91 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2432, 78 Lab.Cas. P 11,238

CERTIFIED BUILDING PRODUCTS, INC., and Carl Fidler, an
Individual, Petitioners,
v.
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent.

No. 74--2777.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

Jan. 23, 1976.

Robert S. Michaels (argued), Michaels, Ornstein & Kontos, Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioners.

John Depenbrock (argued), NLRB, Washington, D.C., for respondent.

OPINION

Before GOODWIN and SNEED, Circuit Judges, and JAMESON,[*] District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

We allow enforcement of the Board's remedial order in this unfair-labor-practices proceeding under 29 U.S.C. § 158(a)(1) and (5).

2

The only nonfrivolous issue on appeal is whether in personam jurisdiction of Carl Fidler was obtained. The record supports the Board's finding that the corporation is Fidler's alter ego. Accordingly, in a board proceeding of this kind, service upon the corporation is the equivalent of service upon the individual. Fidler was the sole owner and principal actor in the matters giving rise to the complaint. See N.L.R.B. v. Deena Artware, Inc., 310 F.2d 470 (6th Cir. 1962).

3

The Board will present an appropriate enforcing order upon which a judgment will be entered.

4

Affirmed.

*

The Honorable William J. Jameson, United States District Judge for the District of Montana, sitting by designation