Harrison v. United States, 532 F.2d 750 (4th Cir. 1976). · Go Syfert
Search
Harrison v. United States, 532 F.2d 750 (4th Cir. 1976). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
49 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 14 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Jose Luis Oropeza and Mark James Minton (ca9, 1977-11-08) · Strongest negative: United States v. Jeffrey R. MacDonald (ca4, 1982-08-16)
Treatment trajectory · 1976 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1976 2001 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "but see" United States v. Jeffrey R. MacDonald (2×)
4th Cir. · 1982 · signal: but cf. · confidence high
But cf. Lowery v. State of Maryland, 401 F.Supp. 604, 607 (D.Md.1975), aff’d without published opinion, 532 F.2d 750 (4th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 919 , 97 S.Ct. 312 , 50 L.Ed.2d 285 (1976).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Jose Luis Oropeza and Mark James Minton
9th Cir. · 1977 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Barrett, supra. But see Lowery v. Maryland, 401 F.Supp. 604 (D.Md.1975), affirmed 532 F.2d 750 (4th Cir. 1976).
cited Cited "see, e.g." State v. Carpenter
Ohio Ct. App. · 1997 · signal: see also · confidence low
See, also, Lowery v. Maryland (D.Md.1975), 401 F.Supp. 604, 607-608 , affirmed without opinion (C.A.4,1976), 532 F.2d 750 .
cited Cited "see, e.g." State v. Branham
Ohio Ct. App. · 1995 · signal: see also · confidence low
See, also, Lowery v. Maryland (D.Md.1975), 401 F.Supp. 604, 607-608 , affirmed without opinion, (C.A.4, 1976), 532 F.2d 750 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Bond v. State
Md. Ct. Spec. App. · 1992 · signal: see also · confidence low
In United States v. Young Brothers, Inc., 728 F.2d 682, 691 (5th Cir.1984), the 5th Circuit, relying upon Thomas , again held that the “requirement [that the declarant take the stand, assert the privilege and the court recognize it] need not be met when its fulfillment would be a mere ‘formalism.’ ” In United States v. Brainard, 690 F.2d 1117 (4th Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1099 , 105 S.Ct. 2320 , 85 L.Ed.2d 839 (1985), the 4th Circuit considered a proffer by appellant’s attorney that “I will advise him and he will accept my advice to claim the privilege of the Fifth Amendm…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Daniel King Brainard, United States of America v. Halton Q. Bittick, Jr. (2×)
4th Cir. · 1983 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Lowery v. Maryland, 401 F.Supp. 604, 606 (D.Md.1975), aff'd, 532 F.2d 750 (4th Cir. 1976) (unpublished opinion), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 919 , 97 S.Ct. 312 , 50 L.Ed.2d 285 (1976) (where a witness' attorney has indicated that he will assert the Fifth Amendment privilege if called, and the claim of privilege would have merit, the witness is unavailable despite the absence of a formal ruling). 11 The attorney's representation that Moss would claim the privilege, and the district court's statement that the privilege would be available, suffice to constitute Moss an "unavailable witness." …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Harrison
v.
United States
75-2373.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Apr 22, 1976.
532 F.2d 750
Published

532 F.2d 750

Harrison
v.
U. S.

No. 75-2373

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

4/22/76

1

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED AND DISMISSED