Hanzimanolis v. Codd, 538 F.2d 309 (2d Cir. 1976). · Go Syfert
Search
Hanzimanolis v. Codd, 538 F.2d 309 (2d Cir. 1976). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
79 citation events (9 in the last 25 years) across 24 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Titsch v. Reliance Group, Inc. (nysd, 1982-09-16)
Treatment trajectory · 1975 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1975 2000 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Titsch v. Reliance Group, Inc.
S.D.N.Y. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See Guitar v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation, 396 F.Supp. 1042, 1053 (S.D.N.Y. 1975) (Carter, J.), aff’d, 538 F.2d 309 (2d Cir. 1976) (after a full opportunity for discovery, summary judgment cannot be defeated by mere conjecture).
discussed Cited "see" MacHleder v. Diaz
S.D.N.Y. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See Guitar v. Westinghouse Electric Corp., 396 F.Supp. 1042 (S.D.N.Y.1975), aff’d, 538 F.2d 309 (2d Cir. 1976); Meeropol v. Nizer, 381 F.Supp. 29, 32 (S.D.N.Y.1974), aff’d, 560 F.2d 1061 (2d Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1013 , 98 S.Ct. 727 , 54 L.Ed.2d 756 (1978); see also, Washington Post v. Keogh, 365 F.2d 965 (D.C.Cir.1966), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 1011 , 87 S.Ct. 708 , 17 L.Ed.2d 548 (1967).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Leimbach v. Califano
8th Cir. · 1979 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., Goff v. Weinberger, CCH UIR 114,470 (D.Conn.1975), aff’d, 538 F.2d 309 (2d Cir. 1976), cert. denied, sub nom.
cited Cited "see, e.g." Leimbach v. Califano
8th Cir. · 1979 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., Goff v. Weinberger, CCH UIR P 14,470 (D.Conn.1975), Aff'd, 538 F.2d 309 (2d Cir. 1976), Cert. denied, sub nom.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hanzimanolis
v.
Codd
75-7700.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Apr 21, 1976.
538 F.2d 309
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

538 F.2d 309

Hanzimanolis
v.
Codd

No. 75-7700

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

4/21/76

S.D.N.Y., 404 F.Supp. 719

1

AFFIRMED[*]

*

Oral opinion delivered in open court in the belief that no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. An oral opinion or a summary order is not citable as precedent. Local Rule Sec. 0.23