green
Positive treatment
4.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1975 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1975
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
United States of America and W. Donald Bell, Special Assistant, Internal Revenue Service v. The Equitable Trust Company, and Victor Divivo
(2×)
Here, on the other hand, the District Court found that Special Agent Olivero was investigating Gattuso "solely for the purpose of unearthing evidence of criminal conduct." 76-1 U.S.T.C., at 84,073, 37 A.F.T.R.2d, at 76-1240.
cited
Cited "see"
Wynne v. Fischer
See Cantlon v. Ernce, 37 A.F.T.R.2d 76 -1238 (N.D.Tex.1975); Smith v. Commissioner, 34 T.C. 1100 , aff'd, 294 F.2d 957 (5th Cir.1964) (penalty).
cited
Cited "see"
Diebold, Inc. v. United States
See Ed Smith-back Publishing, 37 A.F.T.R.2d at 76-495 (citing Witte , for the proposition that consent is required even if "the change was to correct use of a previous but erroneous method”).
cited
Cited "see"
Sanders v. Thrall Car Manufacturing Co.
See Myers v. American Leisure Time Enterprises, 402 F.Supp. 213, 214-15 (S.D.N.Y.1976), aff'd, 538 F.2d 312 (2d Cir.1976); Herman v. Beretta, [1978 Transfer Binder], Fed.Sec.L.Rep.
discussed
Cited "see"
Redington v. Touche Ross & Co.
P 95,648 at p. 90,213 (S.D.N.Y.1976); DuPont v. Wyly, 61 F.R.D. 615, 628 (D.Del.1973); In re Penn Central Securities Litigation, 347 F.Supp. 1327, 1340 (E.D.Pa.1972), relevant point adhered to on reargument, 357 F.Supp. 869 (E.D.Pa.1973), aff'd, 494 F.2d 528 , 539-40 (3d Cir. 1974); see Myers v. American Leisure Time Enterprises, Inc., 402 F.Supp. 213, 214 (S.D.N.Y.1975), aff'd without opinion, 538 F.2d 312 (2d Cir. 1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Redington v. Touche Ross & Co.
Meer v. United Brands Co., [1976-77 Transfer Binder] CCH Fed.Sec.L.Rep. 1! 95,648 at p. 90,-213 (S.D.N.Y.1976); duPont v. Wyly, 61 F.R.D. 615, 628 (D.Del.1973); In re Penn Central Securities Litigation, 347 F.Supp. 1327, 1340 (E.D.Pa.1972), relevant point adhered to on reargument, 357 F.Supp. 869 (E.D.Pa.1973), aff'd, 494 F.2d 528 , 539-40 (3d Cir. 1974); see Myers v. American Leisure Time Enterprises, Inc., 402 F.Supp. 213, 214 (S.D.N.Y.1975), affd without opinion, 538 F.2d 312 (2d Cir. 1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United Steelworkers of America v. National Labor Relations Board
See also Dee Knitting Mills, Inc., 214 N.L.R.B. 1041 , 1051 (1974), enforced, NLRB v. Dee Knitting Mills, Inc., 538 F.2d 312 (2d Cir. 1975); Fuqua Homes Missouri, Inc., 201 N.L.R.B. 130 , 135 (1973). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Stromfeld v. Great Atlantic & Pac. Tea Co., Inc.
See, e. g., Myers v. American Leisure Time Enterprises, Inc., 402 F.Supp. 213 (S.D.N.Y.1975), aff’d without opinion, 538 F.2d 312 (2d Cir. 1976) (section 13(d)); In re Penn Central Securities Litigation, 494 F.2d 528 , 539-41 (3d Cir. 1974) (section 13(a)); *1086 Rosengarten v. International Telephone & Telegraph Corp., 466 F.Supp. 817, 827 (S.D.N.Y. 1979) (section 13(a)); Nemo v. Allen, 466 F.Supp. 192, 195-96 (S.D.N.Y.1979) (section 13(a)).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Paduano
v.
C. I. R
v.
C. I. R
75-4138.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Jan 12, 1976.
Published
76-1 USTC P 9187
Paduano
v.
C. I. R.
No. 75-4138
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
1/12/76
1
T.C.
2
AFFIRMED[*]
*
Oral opinion delivered in open court in the belief that no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. An oral opinion or a summary order is not citable as precedent. Local Rule Sec. 0.23