green
Positive treatment
2.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1975 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1975
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Teong-Chan Gaw v. Commissioner
See Estate of Weiskopf v. Commissioner , 64 T.C. 78 , 96-98 (1975) , affd. without published opinion 538 F.2d 317 (2d Cir. 1976) ; see also Davant v. Commissioner , 366 F.2d 874 , 878 , 881 (5th Cir. 1966) , affg. in part, revg. in part on another issue South Texas Rice Warehouse Co. v. Commissioner , 43 T.C. 540 (1965) ; Blueberry Land Co. v. Commissioner , 361 F.2d 93 , 98 (5th Cir. 1966) , affg. 42 T.C. 1137 ↩ (1964) . 89.
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Grocerland Cooperative, Inc.
See In re Weis Securities, Inc., 411 F.Supp. 194 (S.D.N.Y.1975), aff’d, 538 F.2d 317, 319 (2d Cir.1976) (petition to allow late claim denied even though notice was never received).
discussed
Cited "see"
Travelers Indemnity Co. v. M.S. Kiso Maru
If Travelers should make such a showing, in order to escape liability Nippon would have to show that the loss was due to one of the causes excepted under • Cogsa, 46 U.S.C. § 1304 (2), or that “it exercised due diligence to avoid and prevent the harm.” Lekas & Drivas, Inc. v. Goulandris, 306 F.2d 426, 429 (2d Cir. 1962); accord, Yawata Iron & Steel Co. v. Anthony Shipping Co., 396 F.Supp. 619, 621 (S.D.N.Y.1975) (Lumbard, J., sitting by designation), aff’d mem., 538 F.2d 317 (2d Cir. 1976); Insurance Co. of North America v. S.S.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wendy Jean Jorgensen v. Judy Larsen, an Employee of the Department of Public Safety of the State of Utah
See, e.g., Wells v. Malloy, 402 F.Supp. 856, 858 (D.Vt.1975) (driver's license is not a fundamental property right in the constitutional sense), aff'd 538 F.2d 317 (2d Cir.1976); Snelgrove v. Department of Motor Vehicles, 194 Cal.App.3d 1364 , 240 Cal.Rptr. 281, 289 (1987) (driving is not a fundamental right for equal protection or due process purposes and is subject to police power regulation). 19 Plaintiff's remaining assertions of error were not addressed by the district court.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Holsatia Shipping Corp. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.
See, e.g., Yawata Iron & Steel Co. v. Anthony Shipping Co., 396 F.Supp. 619 (S.D.N.Y.1975), aff’d mem., 538 F.2d 317 (2d Cir. 1976) [“Yawata”]; Margarine Verkaufsunion G.m.B.H. v. M.T.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Wolfish
v.
Wolfish
75-1358.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Jan 8, 1976.
538 F.2d 317
Published
U. S.
v.
Wolfish
No. 75-1358
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
1/8/76
1
S.D.N.Y.
2
AFFIRMED[*]
*
Oral opinion delivered in open court in the belief that no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. An oral opinion or a summary order is not citable as precedent. Local Rule Sec. 0.23