yellow
Treated with caution
-0.1 score
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Opinion No.
But cf. Meltzer v. Board of Public Instruction of Orange County, 548 F.2d 559 (Cir. 1977) reh. granted, 553 F.2d 1008 (1977) on reh., 577 F.2d 311 (1978) (confining distribution to one central location upheld by an equally divided court), cert. denied 439 U.S. 1089 (1979).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Charles S. GRAINGER Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
STATE SECURITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY Et Al., Defendants-Appellees
v.
STATE SECURITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY Et Al., Defendants-Appellees
75-3061.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
May 25, 1977.
Marvin Cherner, J. Vernon Patrick, Jr., James W. May, Birmingham, Ala., for plaintiffs-appellants., John H. Morrow, George R. Stuart, III, John W. Haley, Birmingham, Ala., for State Sec. et al., Robert R. Reid, Jr., Birmingham, Ala., for L. W. Nimmo & Nimmo Asso., Inc.
Brown, Thornberry, Coleman, Goldberg, Ainsworth, Godbold, Morgan, Clark, Roney, Gee, Tjoflat, Hill, Fay.
Published
BY THE COURT:
A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed.[*1009] The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.