Billingsley v. Seibels, 556 F.2d 276 (5th Cir. 1977). · Go Syfert
Billingsley v. Seibels, 556 F.2d 276 (5th Cir. 1977). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
5 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Cited for
At page 277 Determining the scope of the search incident to arrest1 citing case
  • Gresham Park Cmty. Org. v. Gary Howell, 652 F.2d 1227 (5th Cir. 1981).published
    For Fifth Circuit cases indicating parties may reserve federal claims, see Cornwell v. Ferguson, 545 F.2d 1022 (5th Cir. 1977); Jennings v. Caddo Parish School Board, 531 F.2d 1331 (5th cir. 1976); Billingsley v. Seibels, 556 F.2d 276, 277…
Other citing cases2 with no pin cite or quoted language on record
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Orzell Billingsley, Sr., Mrs. Blanche McSwain and Mrs. Essie Mae Rice
v.
George G. Seibels, Jr., Individually and as Mayor of the City of Birmingham, Alabama
76-3568.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Jul 21, 1977.
Published opinion
556 F.2d 276
1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 12357
Published

556 F.2d 276

Orzell BILLINGSLEY, Sr., Mrs. Blanche McSwain, and Mrs.
Essie Mae Rice, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
George G. SEIBELS, Jr., Individually and as Mayor of the
City of Birmingham, Alabama, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 76-3568

Summary Calendar.[*]

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

July 21, 1977.
Rehearing Denied Aug. 24, 1977.

Orzell Billingsley, Jr., Birmingham, Ala., for plaintiffs-appellants.

James G. Adams, III, Herbert Jenkins, Jr., Birmingham, Ala., for City defendants-appellees.

Douglas P. Corretti, Samuel Maples, Birmingham, Ala., for American Title Ins.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama.

Before THORNBERRY, RONEY and HILL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

[*~276–277]1

Affirmed. See Billingsley v. Seibels, 433 F.Supp. 1 (N.D.Ala.1976).

2

Appellants seek to distinguish the principle of Jennings v. Caddo Parish School Bd., 531 F.2d 1331 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 897, 97 S.Ct. 260, 50 L.Ed.2d 180 (1976) on the ground that they were defendants in a state court action, rather than plaintiffs. This distinction does not appear to be sufficient to bring appellants within the rule announced in England v. Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners, 375 U.S. 411, 84 S.Ct. 461, 11 L.Ed.2d 440 (1964). See Brown v. Chastain, 416 F.2d 1012 (5th Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 951, 90 S.Ct. 976, 25 L.Ed.2d 134 (1970).

*

Rule 18, 5 Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I