green
Positive treatment
2.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Kinzig v. First Fidelity Bank, NA
See, Perini Corp. v. First National Bank of Habersham County, 553 F. 2d 398, 403-404 (5th Cir.), rehearing den. en banc, 557 F. 2d 823 (5th Cir.1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Pandelis Constraction Co. v. Jones-Viking Associates
See United States v. Smyth, 556 F.2d 1179 , reh’g denied, 557 F.2d 823 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 862 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
American Liberty Insurance Co. v. Amsouth Bank
(2×)
See, e.g., Perini Corp. v. First Nat'l Bank of Habersham County, Georgia , 553 F.2d 398 , rehearing denied , 557 F.2d 823 (5th Cir. 1977); County Concrete Corp. v. Smith , 317 N.J.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees v. County of Nassau
The federal appellate courts which had previously considered the question had decided that a fee award could not be made to a prevailing defendant if the action had not been “unfounded, meritless, frivolous or vexatiously brought.” See United States Steel Corp. v. United States, 519 F.2d 359, 363-64 (3rd Cir.1975); see also, Bolton v. Murray Envelope Coi"p., 553 F.2d 881 , 884 n. 2 (5th Cir.), reh’g denied, 557 F.2d 823 (5th Cir.1977); Car rion v. Yeshiva Univ., 535 F.2d 722, 727 (2d Cir.1976).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Smyth
v.
Smyth
76-2314.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Jul 20, 1977.
557 F.2d 823
Published
U. S.
v.
Smyth
No. 76-2314
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
7/20/77
N.D.Tex., 556 F.2d 1179