King v. Gemini Food Servs., Inc., 562 F.2d 297 (4th Cir. 1977). · Go Syfert
Search
King v. Gemini Food Servs., Inc., 562 F.2d 297 (4th Cir. 1977). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
31 citation events (6 in the last 25 years) across 15 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Republic Insurance v. Culbertson (vaed, 1989-06-13)
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977 2001 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Republic Insurance v. Culbertson
E.D. Va. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
Wright & A. Miller, Federal Practice & Procedure § 1367, at 685 (1969); see King v. Gemini Food Servs., Inc., 438 F.Supp. 964, 966 (E.D.Va.1976) (judgment on pleadings appropriate when viewed in light most favorable to nonmovant, no issue of material fact and case can be decided as matter of law), aff'd on other grounds, 562 F.2d 297 (4th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1065 , 98 S.Ct. 1242 , 55 L.Ed.2d 766 (1978).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Robertson (2×)
E.D. Va. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See King v. Gemini Food Services, Inc., 438 F.Supp. 964, 966 (E.D.Va.1976), aff'd, 562 F.2d 297 (4th Cir.1977) (per curiam) (adopting district court’s reasoning), cert, denied sub. nom.
cited Cited "see" Lord v. LOCAL UNION NO. 2088
M.D. Fla. · 1979 · signal: see · confidence high
See King v. Gemini Food Services, Inc., 562 F.2d at 298 ; King v. Gemini Food Services, Inc., 438 F.Supp. at 966 ; Vincent v. General Dynamics Corp., 427 F.Supp. at 799-800 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Anderson v. Anderson
Ind. Ct. App. · 1979 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare, King v. Gemini Food Services, Inc., (E.D.Va.1976) 438 F.Supp. 964 , aff'd. (4 Cir.), 562 F.2d 297 , cert. den., 434 U.S. 1065 , 98 S.Ct. 1242 , 55 L.Ed.2d 766 (test applicable for judgment on the pleadings or summary judgment is whether or not, when viewed in light most favorable to non-movant, no genuine issues of material fact remains and the case can be decided as a matter of law), with Shapiro v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, (S.D.N.Y.1972) 353 F.Supp. 264 , aff'd., (2 Cir.), 495 F.2d 228 (even though defense of failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted is…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Peggie Ann King, Dynnel Johnson, Barbara Jenkins, and Irene Combs
v.
Gemini Food Services, Inc., Ernest McNeal Sidney C. Ragland, and Public Service Employees Local Union 572 of the Laborers International Union of North America, Afl-Cio
77-1064.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Sep 6, 1977.
562 F.2d 297
Published

562 F.2d 297

96 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2204, 82 Lab.Cas. P 10,120

Peggie Ann KING, Dynnel Johnson, Barbara Jenkins, and Irene
Combs, Appellants,
v.
GEMINI FOOD SERVICES, INC., Ernest McNeal, Sidney C.
Ragland, and Public Service Employees Local Union
572 of the Laborers International Union
of North America, AFL-CIO, Appellees.

No. 77-1064.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Argued June 9, 1977.
Decided Sept. 6, 1977.

James Newton Wilhoit, III, Fairfax, Va., (Milton L. Chappell, Rex H. Reed, National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation, Fairfax, Va., Stephen M. Smith, Joseph Smith, Ltd., Hampton, Va., on brief), for appellants.

H. Brent Fortson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Columbia, S. C. (Daniel R. McLeod, Atty. Gen. of South Carolina, Columbia, S. C., Anthony F. Troy, Atty. Gen. of Va., D. Patrick Lacy, Jr., Deputy Atty. Gen., Richmond, Va., Rufus L. Edmisten, Atty. Gen. of N. C., Andrew A. Vanore, Jr., Senior Deputy Atty. Gen. and George Lennon, Associate Atty. Gen., Raleigh, N. C., on brief), for amici curiae States of South Carolina, Commonwealth of Virginia and State of North Carolina.

Jules Bernstein, Washington, D. C. (Robert J. Connerton, Arthur M. Schiller, Washington, D. C., Norman Olitsky and Marcia L. L. Olitsky, Portsmouth, Va., on brief), for appellees.

Hugh J. Beins, Washington, D. C., and Jonathan G. Axelrod, Bethesda, Md., on brief), for amicus curiae Teamsters Local Union No. 922.

Before WINTER, BUTZNER and WIDENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Peggie Ann King, Barbara Jenkins, and Irene Combs appeal the district court's denial of declaratory and injunctive relief, as well as monetary damages. Their major contention is that for purposes of an employment contract on a federal enclave, the Virginia Right to Work Law (Va.Code § 40.1-58 et seq.) is assimilated into federal law by the Assimilated Crimes Act (18 U.S.C. § 13).

2

The district court concluded that the Virginia law is not incorporated into federal law. For the reasons sufficiently stated in its opinion, we affirm. See King v. Gemini Food Services, 93 LRRM 2921, 438 F.Supp. 964 (E.D.Va.1976).