green
Positive treatment
4.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1978 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1978
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 21 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Lovati v. Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela
See Gray v. Permanent Mission of People’s Republic of Congo to United Nations, 443 F. Supp. 816, 821 (S.D.N.Y.), aff’d, 580 F.2d 1044 (2d Cir. 1978) (noting “informal notification through channels clearly outside the obvious requirements of the applicable statute cannot be substituted for those which meet the requirements.”) Even if the Court was inclined to follow Marlowe’s substantial compliance approach, the instant service issue goes beyond mere typographical errors and technical noncompliance.
discussed
Cited "see"
Lovati v. Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela
See Gray v. Permanent Mission of People’s Republic of Congo to United Nations, 443 F. Supp. 816, 821 (S.D.N.Y.), aff’d, 580 F.2d 1044 (2d Cir. 1978) (noting “informal notification through channels clearly outside the obvious requirements of the applicable statute cannot be substituted for those which meet the requirements.”) Even if the Court was inclined to follow Marlowe’s substantial compliance approach, the instant service issue goes beyond mere typographical errors and technical noncompliance.
discussed
Cited "see"
Fagan v. Deutsche Bundesbank
See Gray v. Permanent Mission of People’s Republic of Congo, 443 F.Supp. 816, 819-21 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd, 580 F.2d 1044 (2d Cir.1978) (holding that a country’s mission to the United Nations was required to be served under § 1608(a)).
cited
Cited "see"
In re Nasdaq Market-Makers Antitrust Litigation
See Bacon v. Toia, 437 F.Supp. 1371, 1381 (S.D.N.Y.1977), aff'd, 580 F.2d 1044 (2d Cir.1978).
cited
Cited "see"
German v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp.
See Bacon v. Toia, 437 F.Supp. 1371, 1381 (S.D.N.Y.1977), aff'd, 580 F.2d 1044 (2d Cir.1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
German v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp.
See Bacon v. Toia, 437 F.Supp. 1371, 1381 (S.D.N.Y.1977), aff'd, 580 F.2d 1044 (2d Cir.1978). *556 Stenson v. Blum, 476 F.Supp. at 1335 (quoting Eisen v. Carlisle & Jacquelin, 391 F.2d 555, 562 (2d Cir.1968)).
cited
Cited "see"
Jackson v. Foley
See Bacon v. Toia, 437 F.Supp. 1371, 1383 (S.D.N.Y.1977), aff'd without op, 580 F.2d 1044 (2d Cir.1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
St. Paul Surplus Lines Insurance Company v. Joel D. Davis, and Stanley Lewis Joel Davis and Stanley Lewis, a Partnership, T/a Torahtowne, Incorporated
See Gray v. Permanent Mission of the People's Republic of the Congo to the United Nations, 443 F. Supp. 816, 821-22 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd, 580 F.2d 1044 (2d Cir. 1978); 10 Charles A. Wright et al., Federal Practice and Procedure § 2697.
cited
Cited "see"
Purves v. ICM Artists, Ltd.
See Afshar v. Procon Inc., 442 F.Supp. 887, 891 (S.D.N.Y.1977) (statute of limitations for civil conspiracy runs from commission of overt act causing damage), aff’d, 580 F.2d 1044 (2d Cir. 1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Gerritsen v. Escobar Y Cordova
See, Gray v. The Permanent Mission of the People’s Republic of the Congo to the United Nations, 443 F.Supp. 816, 820 (S.D.N.Y.1978), aff’d, 580 F.2d 1044 (2d Cir.1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Boland v. Bank Sepah-Iran
See Gray v. Permanent Mission of the People’s Republic of the Congo to the United Nations, 443 F.Supp. 816, 821 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd mem., 580 F.2d 1044 (2d Cir.1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Orantes-Hernandez v. Smith
See Bacon v. Toia, 437 F.Supp. 1371, 1381 (S.D.N.Y.1977), aff’d, 580 F.2d 1044 (2d Cir. 1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Lee v. Board of Higher Ed. in City of New York
See Bacon v. Toia, 437 F.Supp. 1371, 1381 (S.D.N.Y.1977), aff’d, 580 F.2d 1044 (2d Cir. 1978), vacated on other grounds, (2d Cir. Aug. 21, 1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Stenson v. Blum
See Bacon v. Toia, 437 F.Supp. 1371, 1381 (S.D.N.Y.1977), aff’d, 580 F.2d 1044 (2d Cir. 1978).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
York Hannover Holding A.G. v. American Arbitration Ass'n
See also Matter of Ferrara S.p.A., 441 F.Supp. 778 , 779-80 and 80 n. 2 (S.D.N.Y.1977), aff'd, 580 F.2d 1044 (2d Cir.1978) (petition to stay pending arbitration removed under § 205).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Filanto, S.P.A. v. Chilewich International Corp.
See also Matter of Ferrara, S.p.A., 441 F.Supp. 778, 780-81 (S.D.N.Y.1977), aff 'd without opinion, 580 F.2d 1044 (2d Cir.1978).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Benage v. Gibralter Building & Loan Ass'n
See, e.g., Gray v. Permanent Mission of the Congo, 443 F.Supp. 816, 820-21 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd, 580 F.2d 1044 (2d Cir.1978); Martin v. N.Y.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Kozlowski v. Coughlin
See also Bacon v. Toia, 437 F.Supp. 1371, 1383 (S.D.N.Y.1977), aff’d, 580 F.2d 1044 (2d Cir. 1978). 2.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Leist v. Shawano County
See, e. g., Bacon v. Toia, 437 F.Supp. 1371 (S.D.N.Y. 1977), aff’d, 580 F.2d 1044 (2d Cir. 1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Davis v. Smith
See, e. g., Bacon v. Toia, 437 F.Supp. 1371 (S.D.N.Y.1977) (judgment enjoining enforcement of newly enacted statute which superseded regulations here involved), Aff'd by order, 580 F.2d 1044 (2 Cir. 1978), Remanded by order, No. 77-7567 (2 Cir. Aug. 21, 1978); Greklek v. Toia, 565 F.2d 1259 (2 Cir. 1977), Cert. denied, 436 U.S. 962 (1978). 2 Although the holding of the district court on the merits is cast in the form of a declaratory judgment and injunction, the court expressly stated that it would "decide the merits of the claims by ruling on the application for summary judgment rather than o…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Davis ex rel. Gray v. Smith
See, e.g., Bacon v. Toia, 437 F.Supp. 1371 (S.D.N.Y.1977) (judgment enjoining enforcement of newly enacted statute which superseded regulations here involved), aff’d by order, 580 F.2d 1044 (2 Cir. 1978), remanded by order, No. 77-7567 (2 Cir. Aug. 21, 1978); Greklek v. Toia, 565 F.2d 1259 (2 Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 962 (1978). .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Howell-Kessler Co.
v.
Bliss
v.
Bliss
78-5005.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
May 17, 1978.
580 F.2d 1044
Published
Howell-Kessler Co.
v.
Bliss
No. 78-5005
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
5/17/78
1
S.D.N.Y.
2
AFFIRMED[*]
*
Oral opinion delivered in open court in the belief that no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. An oral opinion or a summary order is not citable as precedent. Local Rule Sec. 0.23