United States v. Intersimone, 586 F.2d 832 (2d Cir. 1978). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. Intersimone, 586 F.2d 832 (2d Cir. 1978). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
35 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Charles Evans v. Transportacion Maritime Mexicana Ss \Campeche\"" (ca2, 1981-01-05)
Treatment trajectory · 1978 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1978 2002 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Charles Evans v. Transportacion Maritime Mexicana Ss \Campeche\"" (2×)
2d Cir. · 1981 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord, Espinoza v. United States Lines, Inc., 444 F.Supp. 405, 412-13 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd, 586 F.2d 832 (2d Cir. 1978).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Berretta v. Tug Vivian Roehrig, LLC
2d Cir. · 2007 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Espinoza v. U.S. Lines, Inc., 444 F.Supp. 405, 407 (S.D.N.Y.1978), aff'd, 586 F.2d 832 (2d Cir.1978).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Salvatore Giglio and Carmela Giglio v. Farrell Lines Incorporated, and Third-Party v. Universal Maritime Service Corp., Third-Party (2×)
2d Cir. · 1980 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Espinoza v. United States Lines, Inc., 444 F.Supp. 405, 407 (S.D.N.Y.), aff’d, 586 F.2d 832 (2d Cir. 1978) (expert testimony offered to establish whether inspection of containers by ship was customary).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Intersimone
78-1143.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Aug 18, 1978.
586 F.2d 832
Published

586 F.2d 832

U. S.
v.
Intersimone

No. 78-1143

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

8/18/78

1

S.D.N.Y.

2

AFFIRMED[*]

*

Oral opinion delivered in open court in the belief that no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. An oral opinion or a summary order is not citable as precedent. Local Rule Sec. 0.23