Grant v. United States, 591 F.2d 1330 (2d Cir. 1978). · Go Syfert
Search
Grant v. United States, 591 F.2d 1330 (2d Cir. 1978). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
58 citation events (9 in the last 25 years) across 15 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Scott v. Fisher (nywd, 2009-09-10)
Treatment trajectory · 1978 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1978 2002 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Scott v. Fisher
W.D.N.Y. · 2009 · signal: accord · confidence high
United States v. Strauss, 999 F.2d 692, 696 (2d Cir.1993) (citations omitted) (stating that it is well settled that the jury is exclusively responsible for determining a witness’ credibility); see also United States v. Autuori, 212 F.3d 105, 118 (2d Cir.2000) (Where there is conflicting testimony at trial, the reviewing court “defer[s] to the jury’s resolution of the witnesses’ credibility.’ ”) (quoting United States v. Payton, 159 F.3d 49, 56 (2d Cir. 1998)); accord, e.g., Mapp v. Clement, 451 F.Supp. 505, 510 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd, 591 F.2d 1330 (2d Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. …
discussed Cited "see" Dale v. Bartels
S.D.N.Y. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See Fairchild, Arabatzis & Smith, Inc. v. Sackheim, 451 F.Supp. 1189, 1192 (S.D.N.Y.), aff’d., 591 F.2d 1330 (2d Cir.1978); Contemporary Mission, Inc. v. United States Postal Service, 648 F.2d 97, 105-06 (2d Cir.1981); Black v. United States, 534 F.2d 524, 528 (2d Cir.1976).
cited Cited "see" Miles v. U. S. Department of Labor
M.D. Penn. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See Forrester v. U. S. Department of Labor, 433 F.Supp. 987, 989 (S.D.N.Y.1977), aff’d, 591 F.2d 1330 (2d Cir. 1978).
cited Cited "see" Kanter v. Internal Revenue Service
N.D. Ill. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See Forrester v. United States Dept. of Labor, 433 F.Supp. 987 (S.D.N.Y.1977), aff’d, 591 F.2d 1330 (2d Cir. 1978).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Friedman v. Young
S.D.N.Y. · 1988 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Fairchild, Arabatzis & Smith, Inc. v. Sackheim, 451 F.Supp. 1189, 1192-93 (S.D.N.Y.), aff 'd mem., 591 F.2d 1330 (2d Cir.1978) (dismissing Bivens claim even though complaint may have stated a claim for common law battery).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Stephen J. Harbulak v. County of Suffolk
2d Cir. · 1981 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Fairchild, Arabatzis & Smith, Inc. v. Sackheim, 451 F.Supp. 1189, 1192-93 (S.D.N.Y.), aff’d mem., 591 F.2d 1330 (2d Cir. 1978).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Grant
v.
United States
78-2072.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Oct 31, 1978.
591 F.2d 1330
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

591 F.2d 1330

Grant
v.
U. S.

No. 78-2072

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

10/31/78

S.D.N.Y., 447 F.Supp. 732

1

AFFIRMED[*]

*

Oral opinion delivered in open court in the belief that no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. An oral opinion or a summary order is not citable as precedent. Local Rule Sec. 0.23