Iron Arrow Honor Soc'y, Etc., John T. Benedict, Etc. v. Joseph A. Califano, Jr., Sec'y of Health, Educ. & Welfare, 597 F.2d 590 (5th Cir. 1979). · Go Syfert
Search
Iron Arrow Honor Soc'y, Etc., John T. Benedict, Etc. v. Joseph A. Califano, Jr., Sec'y of Health, Educ. & Welfare, 597 F.2d 590 (5th Cir. 1979). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
15 citation events across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Iron Arrow Honor Society v. Heckler (scotus, 1983-11-14)
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Iron Arrow Honor Society v. Heckler (2×)
SCOTUS · 1983 · confidence medium
Iron Arrow Honor Society v. Calif ano, 597 F. 2d 590, 591 (1979).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Iron Arrow Honor Society, a \Tap\" or Recognition Association for Men v. Margaret M. Heckler (2×)
unknown court · 1983 · confidence medium
This Court reversed in light of the “unequivocal statement of the position of the University of Miami that but for the action of the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, it would not have barred and would not in the future bar the Iron Arrow Honor Society from its campus.” Iron Arrow Honor Society v. Califano, 597 F.2d 590, 591 (5th Cir.1979).
cited Cited "see" Voyles v. Watkins
N.D. Miss. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See Jurek v. Estelle, 593 F.2d 672, 683 (5 Cir.), reh. en banc granted, 597 F.2d 590 (1979); Sincox v. United States, 571 F.2d 876, 879-80 (5 Cir. 1978).
cited Cited "see" Ernest Benjamin Smith v. W. J. Estelle, Jr., Director, Texas Dept. Of Corrections
5th Cir. · 1979 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally Jurek v. Estelle, 593 F.2d 672, 680-85 (1979), reh. en banc granted, 597 F.2d 590 (1979).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Washington v. Strickland
5th Cir. · 1982 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Jurek v. Estelle, 593 F.2d 672, 680-84 (5th Cir.), vacated, 597 F.2d 590 (5th Cir.1979), rehearing en banc, 623 F.2d 929 (5th Cir.1980) (issue of interplay between Wainwright and substantive prejudice requirement not reached), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1001 , 101 S.Ct. 1709 , 68 L.Ed.2d 203 (1981); Canary v. Bland, 583 F.2d 887, 890 (6th Cir.1978).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Washington v. Strickland
5th Cir. · 1982 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Jurek v. Estelle, 593 F.2d 672, 680-84 (5th Cir.), vacated, 597 F.2d 590 (5th Cir.1979), rehearing en banc, 623 F.2d 929 (5th Cir. 1980) (issue of interplay between Wainwright and substantive prejudice requirement not reached), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1001 , 101 S.Ct. 1709 , 68 L.Ed.2d 203 (1981); Canary v. Bland, 583 F.2d 887, 890 (6th Cir.1978).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Ronald Krzeminski v. E. P. Perini, Superintendent, Marion Correction Facility
6th Cir. · 1980 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Jurek v. Estelle, 593 F.2d 672, 680-85 (5th Cir. 1979), reh. en banc granted, 597 F.2d 590 (1979). 3 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
IRON ARROW HONOR SOCIETY, Etc., Plaintiff-Appellant, John T. Benedict, Etc., Plaintiff,
v.
Joseph A. CALIFANO, Jr., Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, Et Al., Defendants-Appellees
77-2375.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Jun 11, 1979.
597 F.2d 590
Elizabeth J. duFresne, Miami, Fla., for plaintiff-appellant. ‘, Jacob V. Eskenazi, U. S. Atty., Miami, Fla., Alexander C. Ross, Drew S. Days, III, Attys., U. S. Dept, of Justice, Washington, D. C., Charles C. Kline, Miami, Fla., Teresa T. Milton, Atty., Dept, of Justice, Washington, D. C., Byron B. Mathews, Jr., Miami, Fla., for defendants-appellees.
Brown, Clark, Per Curiam, Vance.
Cited by 4 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM:

In light of the unequivocal statement of the position of the University of Miami that but for the action of the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare it would not have barred and would not in the future bar the Iron Arrow Honor Society from its campus, the decision of the district court on standing of the Society is reversed. Gladstone Realtors v. Village of Bellwood, Part II, - U.S.-,-, 99 S.Ct. 1601, 60 L.Ed.2d 66 (1979); Duke Power Co. v. Carolina Environmental Study Group, 438 U. S. 59, 98 S.Ct. 2620, 2630, 57 L.Ed.2d 595 (1978).

REVERSED.