Hendley v. Cent. of Georgia R.R. Co, 614 F.2d 294 (5th Cir. 1980). · Go Syfert
Search
Hendley v. Cent. of Georgia R.R. Co, 614 F.2d 294 (5th Cir. 1980). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
24 citation events across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Proctor v. United States (mdd, 1990-01-22)
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980 2003 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Proctor v. United States
D. Maryland · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
In considering this final contention, the Court must view the transcript of the proceedings as a whole to determine whether such omis *477 sions from the record disclose any specific prejudice to the defendant’s appeal of the ease under the law requiring the recording of “all proceedings in criminal cases had in open court”. 28 U.S.C. § 753 (b)(1) (1982); see United States v. Taylor, 607 F.2d 153 (5th Cir.1979) rehearing denied 614 F.2d 294 ; see also United States v. Snead, 527 F.2d 590 (4th Cir.1975).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hendley
v.
Central of Georgia Railroad Co
78-1058.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Mar 12, 1980.
614 F.2d 294
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

614 F.2d 294

Hendley
v.
Central of Georgia Railroad Co.

No. 78-1058

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

3/12/80

S.D.Ga., 609 F.2d 1146